Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ipso Jure Ipso Jure
Fitri Arianti
Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Protection Against Victims Of Share Results Application Fraud Fitri Arianti
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Ipso Jure - April
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ssgj9n20

Abstract

In the rapidly advancing era of digitalization, digital applications have become an integral part of everyday life, revolutionizing how we communicate, transact, and interact. However, along with these advancements come new challenges related to the misuse of technology, such as fraud that occurs through Share Results apps. This research aims to investigate the legal protection available to victims of fraud that occurs through such applications, recognizing the pressing need to address vulnerabilities in digital transactions. The research method employed is normative juridical, which involves analyzing the applicable laws and court decisions related to similar cases. By delving into legal frameworks and judicial precedents, the study seeks to elucidate the avenues of recourse available to victims of Share Results app fraud. The results of this research underscore the imperative for increased legal awareness among digital app users, improved regulation to respond to technological dynamics, and more effective law enforcement in dealing with digital crimes. Addressing these issues is essential for safeguarding the security and trust of users within an increasingly complex and dynamic digital ecosystem. Ultimately, the protection of Share Results app fraud victims emerges as a pivotal focus in broader efforts to fortify legal safeguards and ensure accountability within digital transactions. This endeavor is crucial for fostering resilience against emerging threats and fostering confidence in digital platforms.
The Element Of Bad Faith In The Cancellation Of The Mark "Pentakosta"(Study of Decision Number 1/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2021/ PN.Niaga.JktPst) Fitri Arianti
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Ipso Jure - April
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/j00jdb83

Abstract

The application for trademark registration must be made by the applicant in good faith, which is regulated in Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. This thesis research aims to find out and analyze the Court Decision related to the cancellation of the "PENTAKOSTA" trademark which has an element of bad faith and how the basis of the judge's consideration in deciding the case of cancellation of the "PENTAKOSTA" trademark. The type of research used in this study is normative legal research. By using the approach of legislation and case approach. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the relationship between the cancellation of registered trademarks with good faith is on the application for registration of the trademark and the Panel of Judges who decided to cancel the trademark after reviewing the bad faith. In the study of Decision Number 1/Pdt.Sus.HKI/ Merek/2021/PN.Niaga.JktPst is not appropriate in applying the law of evidence which is that there is no finding of bad faith in the registration of the trademark by the Defendant. In addition, the legal consequences of the cancellation of the trademark "PENTAKOSTA" is the end of legal protection provided by the state.
Legal Protection Against Victims Of Share Results Application Fraud Fitri Arianti
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Ipso Jure - April
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/ssgj9n20

Abstract

In the rapidly advancing era of digitalization, digital applications have become an integral part of everyday life, revolutionizing how we communicate, transact, and interact. However, along with these advancements come new challenges related to the misuse of technology, such as fraud that occurs through Share Results apps. This research aims to investigate the legal protection available to victims of fraud that occurs through such applications, recognizing the pressing need to address vulnerabilities in digital transactions. The research method employed is normative juridical, which involves analyzing the applicable laws and court decisions related to similar cases. By delving into legal frameworks and judicial precedents, the study seeks to elucidate the avenues of recourse available to victims of Share Results app fraud. The results of this research underscore the imperative for increased legal awareness among digital app users, improved regulation to respond to technological dynamics, and more effective law enforcement in dealing with digital crimes. Addressing these issues is essential for safeguarding the security and trust of users within an increasingly complex and dynamic digital ecosystem. Ultimately, the protection of Share Results app fraud victims emerges as a pivotal focus in broader efforts to fortify legal safeguards and ensure accountability within digital transactions. This endeavor is crucial for fostering resilience against emerging threats and fostering confidence in digital platforms.
The Element Of Bad Faith In The Cancellation Of The Mark "Pentakosta"(Study of Decision Number 1/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2021/ PN.Niaga.JktPst) Fitri Arianti
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Ipso Jure - April
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/j00jdb83

Abstract

The application for trademark registration must be made by the applicant in good faith, which is regulated in Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. This thesis research aims to find out and analyze the Court Decision related to the cancellation of the "PENTAKOSTA" trademark which has an element of bad faith and how the basis of the judge's consideration in deciding the case of cancellation of the "PENTAKOSTA" trademark. The type of research used in this study is normative legal research. By using the approach of legislation and case approach. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the relationship between the cancellation of registered trademarks with good faith is on the application for registration of the trademark and the Panel of Judges who decided to cancel the trademark after reviewing the bad faith. In the study of Decision Number 1/Pdt.Sus.HKI/ Merek/2021/PN.Niaga.JktPst is not appropriate in applying the law of evidence which is that there is no finding of bad faith in the registration of the trademark by the Defendant. In addition, the legal consequences of the cancellation of the trademark "PENTAKOSTA" is the end of legal protection provided by the state.
Co-Authors