Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Amicus Curiae
Effendy Saragih
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PROSES PENYIDIKAN ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PENGANIAYAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN BERDASARKAN UU NO.11 TAHUN 2012: The Process of Investigation Into Juvenile Persecution Resulting in One’s Demised Based on Law Number 11 of 2012 Astri Ratna Permatasari; Effendy Saragih
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19555

Abstract

The important role of kids as part of defending the life of the nation and state requires the government's awareness to guarantee the right to life of every child. Children need to be protected against all conditions and circumstances, including Juvenile Criminal Justice which they are not familiar with. The difference between the Juvenile Criminal Justice system and adult justice requires certain requirements for law enforcers within it. Juvenile justice involves direct or indirect investigators, child public prosecutors, and juvenile judges in court proceedings. The handling of cases of children who commit criminal acts is regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The results of this study are (1) The process of investigating children who are perpetrators of abuse resulting in death according to Law Number 11 of 2012 at the Tangerang City Police; (2) There are obstacles in the process of investigating children as perpetrators of abuse resulting in death at the Tangerang City Police.
PERAMPASAN BARANG BUKTI UNTUK NEGARA TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (STUDI PUTUSAN NO: 342/PID.SUS/2022/PN.JKT.BRT): Confistering Evidence For The State On Narcotics Crime (Study of Decision No.342/pid.sus/2022/PN.JkTBrt) Vanya Shafa Nabilla Andreas; Effendy Saragih
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19557

Abstract

Abstract Currently, drugs are misused to be consumed, distributed and marketed without obtaining permission from the authorities. The circulation of narcotics without permission or illegally is mostly carried out by irresponsible parties. Arrangements for a Confiscation and seizure for evidence in a narcotics criminal act have been regulated by the law, namely in Article 87 and Article 101 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. In the case of Decision Number 342/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt, the property of a third party used by the defendant was confiscated by the state which resulted in material losses for third parties. Based on the analysis from Decision Number 342/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt, the subject matter raised is 1) How is the consideration of the judge’s decision on decision Number: 342/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt if it is related to the Evidence Procedure contained in Law Number 35 of 2009 and The result of this research is the decision of a narcotics crime Number: 342/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt, who has confiscated evidence for the State in the form of third party property in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 101 paragraph (2) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.
Co-Authors Astri Ratna Permatasari Vanya Shafa Nabilla Andreas