Widya Wira Putri
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Soft Contact Lenses as a Good Option for Adolescent with Anisometropia: Poster Presentation - Case Report - Resident Widya Wira Putri; dr. Ani Ismail, SpM(K); dr. Eva Kumalasari, SpM
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S2 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/jaz7qz11

Abstract

Introduction : Anisometropia is a condition of asymmetric refraction between the two eyes. Adequate anisometropia treatment, such as SCL (Soft Contact Lens) is required to provide binocular vision, patient comfort and also adolescent’s appearance. Case Illustration : A 16 years old woman came to the RS Khusus Mata Sumatera Selatan. She complained of blurred vision since 6 years ago, and not feeling comfortable using spectacle. The ophthalmologic examination revealed that uncorrected visual acuity was 2/60 ph 6/12 for right eye and on left eye is 6/30 ph 6/7.5. Best corrected visual acuity was 6/6 using S-7.00 on the right eye and left eye was 6/6 using correction S-3.00 but she was not comfortable. The base-curve measurement of the SCL was 8.60 mm for the both eyes and the diameter was 14.2 mm. After the contact lenses attached , obtained that S-7.00 D for the right eye and S-3.00 for the left eye could reach 6/6 in both eyes, she was more comfortable wearing SCL than spectacle. Discussion : Anisometropia can cause aniseikonia which is characterized by differences in the size of the image in the two eyes. One way to reduce aniseikonia by reducing the vertex distance, soft contact lenses canbe a choices to maintain binocular vision and minimalized the aniseikonia. Contact lenses significantly improved Adolescent’s appearance and activities, which lead to an overall improvementin satisfaction with vision correction, compared using spectacle. Conclusion : SCL is one of a good option for Adolescent with anisometropia that can provide good visual acuity, and also adolescent’s appearance.
Impact of Systemic Glycemic Control (HbA1c Levels) on Long-Term Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies Ramzi Amin; Widya Wira Putri
Open Access Indonesian Journal of Medical Reviews Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): Open Access Indonesian Journal of Medical Reviews
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/oaijmr.v4i6.733

Abstract

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision impairment in diabetic patients. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the standard first-line treatment, but response variability exists. Systemic glycemic control, measured by Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), is crucial in diabetes management, yet its specific impact on long-term anti-VEGF outcomes in DME requires synthesized evidence from real-world settings. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between baseline HbA1c levels and long-term (≥12 months) visual and anatomical outcomes following anti-VEGF therapy for DME in observational studies. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for observational studies published between January 2013 and December 2023, reporting on baseline HbA1c levels and visual acuity (VA) and/or central retinal thickness (CRT) outcomes at 12 months or longer in DME patients treated with anti-VEGF agents. Primary outcomes were the mean difference in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) change (ETDRS letters) and CRT reduction (microns) between patients with 'better' (HbA1c < 7.5% or lower strata) versus 'poorer' (HbA1c ≥ 7.5% or higher strata) baseline glycemic control at ≥12 months. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Six observational cohort studies, encompassing a total of 1850 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Follow-up durations ranged from 12 to 36 months. The quality assessment indicated moderate-to-high quality across the studies (NOS scores 6-8). Meta-analysis indicated that patients with better baseline glycemic control (HbA1c < 7.5%) achieved significantly greater improvement in BCVA compared to those with poorer control (HbA1c ≥ 7.5%) at ≥12 months (Weighted Mean Difference [WMD]: 4.82 ETDRS letters; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 2.95 to 6.69; P < 0.0001). Significant heterogeneity was observed (I² = 68%). Similarly, patients with better baseline HbA1c showed a trend towards greater CRT reduction, although the difference was not statistically significant (WMD: -25.5 µm; 95% CI: -55.2 to 4.2; P = 0.09; I² = 75%). Subgroup analyses suggested the association was consistent across different anti-VEGF agents used. In Conclusion, this meta-analysis of observational data suggests that better baseline glycemic control (lower HbA1c levels) is significantly associated with superior long-term visual acuity gains following anti-VEGF therapy for DME. While a similar trend was observed for anatomical improvement (CRT reduction), it did not reach statistical significance. These findings highlight the critical importance of optimizing systemic glycemic control alongside local anti-VEGF treatment to maximize long-term visual outcomes in patients with DME.