Rusti Hanindya Sari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A RARE CASE : HOMONYMOUS HEMIANOPIA IN CHILDREN: Poster Presentation - Case Report - Resident RAHAYU WIDHYASTI1; Antonia Kartika Indriati; Rusti Hanindya Sari; Dianita Veulina Ginting; Prettyla Yollamanda
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S2 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/vkcy5658

Abstract

Abstract Introduction : Homonymous hemianopia (HH) is a visual field loss in the same halves of the visual field of each eye that is caused by numerous lesion affecting the retrochiasmal visual pathway. Homonymous hemianopia in children is a rare disabling condition and might be found as an initial presentation of brain tumors. Case Illustration : A 12 years old boy came with chief complaint of partially vision loss on the left side of vision accompanied by intermittent headache. Ophthalmological examination showed visual acuity of 1.0 on both eyes. Visual field examination revealed left homonymous hemianopia (figure 1). These findings were relevant to the result of his brain Computed Tomography (CT) scan, which showed vascular mass in the right occipital lobe caused by suspected arteriovenous malformation mixed diffuse type (figure 2). The patient was referred to neurosurgeon for further management. Discussion : Visual field defect depends on location of the lesion and can be used to recognize optic pathway diseases. Homonymous hemianopia occurs in retrochiasmal lesions that could happened either in adult or children. Unusual presentation of HH in children caused by brain tumor such as arteriovenous malformation. It might occur in up to 27% and can be detected radiologically with either brain CT scan or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Conclusion : Visual field loss in pediatric patient might be challenging. Proper and prompt diagnosis is important to detect underlying condition and determine further management of the patient.
COMPARISON OF VISUAL ACUITY AFTER A COMBINATION OF CITICHOLINE AND METHYLPREDNISOLONE WITH A SINGLE CITICHOLINE TREATMENT IN NON-ARTERITIC ANTERIOR ISCHEMIC OPTIC NEUROPATHY PATIENTS: Oral Presentation - Observational Study - Resident NADYA BEATRIX YOHANNA N.; Antonia Kartika; Ine Renata Musa; Rusti Hanindya Sari; Dianita Veulina Ginting; Prettyla Yollamanda
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 49 No S2 (2023): Supplement Edition
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35749/gqgjn659

Abstract

Abstract Introduction & Objectives : Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) accounts for 90-95% of optic neuropathy in the elderly with symptoms of decreased visual acuity. Posterior ciliary brevis hypoperfusion results in ischemia, triggers oxidative stress, axonal edema as well as compartment syndrome leading to retinal ganglion cell death via apoptosis. There is no gold standard therapy for NAION. Citicholine as a neuroprotector agent has shown satisfactory results in the acute and chronic phases. Methylprednisolone is also a therapeutic consideration that decreases capillary permeability thereby promoting faster resolution of disc edema. This study aimed to compare visual acuity in NAION patients with combination therapy of citicholine and methylprednisolone with single citicholine therapy. Methods : An analytical observational study with retrospective data collection at the National Eye Center of Cicendo Hospital for the period January 2021–February 2022. A total of 59 NAION patients who met the inclusion criteria were then divided into 2 groups, namely receiving a combination of citicholine with corticosteroids and single citicholine treatment. Results : The mean age in the combination group was 52.57±9.035 and the single group was 57.52±10.319. The number of men and women in the combination group were the same while in the single group women was higher. The risk factors obtained were hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, and smoking. There was a significant mean difference between initial visual acuity and3 months after therapy in the combination therapy group (p=0.0001) and in the single group. (p=0.002) Conclusion : Visual acuity in NAION patients with combination therapy of citicholine and methylprednisolone is better than citicholine alone.