Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Padjadjaran Law Research and Debate Society Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Hessy Oktiarifadah
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
TINJAUAN HUKUM DAN IMPLIKASI ATAS INVESTASI ASING PADA PROYEK ENERGI BARU TERBARUKAN (EBT) DI INDONESIA Hessy Oktiarifadah; Charisa Dwi Santika; Fathia Ariandini Zulhian
Padjadjaran Law Review Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024): PADJADJARAN LAW REVIEW VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1 JULI 2024
Publisher : PADJADJARAN LAW RESEARCH AND DEBATE SOCIETY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56895/plr.v12i1.1647

Abstract

Indonesia telah mencanangkan program menuju Net Zero Emission (NZE) pada visi RPJPN 2025-2045 yang menjadi salah satu fokus pemerintah dalam transisi energi pada proyek-proyek EBT. Kendati demikian, pengembangan sektor EBT di Indonesia masih merekam beberapa daftar kendala yang cukup signifikan. Keterbatasan akan dana dan daya tarik investasi menjadi urgensi utama pemerintah dalam pengembangan teknologi EBT yang memadai. Berbagai upaya kebijakan dikeluarkan pemerintah dalam rangka mendukung peningkatan ekosistem investasi dan akselerasi proyek strategis nasional, seperti melalui Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja dan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 79 Tahun 2014 tentang Kebijakan Energi Nasional (PP KEN). Untuk mengatasi kendala tersebut, penanaman modal dari pihak asing berupa Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) menjadi solusi penting pendanaan sektor EBT yang besar. Oleh karenanya, dibutuhkan sinergi kerjasama antara pemerintah, investor, maupun lembaga keuangan dalam akselerasi penyelenggaraan iklim investasi yang kondusif.
Aspek Hukum atas Rencana Perdamaian Yang Diajukan Kedua Kalinya dalam Mekanisme PKPU Selama Tahapan Kepailitan Hessy Oktiarifadah; Elisatris Gultom; Anita Afriana
Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amandemen : Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/amandemen.v2i4.1244

Abstract

This study examines legal deviations in the implementation of the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) mechanism, specifically regarding the approval of a peace settlement submitted for the second time after the debtor is declared bankrupt. The study highlights the Supreme Court Decision No. 648K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021, which ratified the second peace settlement in the case of PT Prospek Duta Sukses. This decision is deemed contradictory to the principle of a single peace settlement, as stipulated in Articles 289 and 292 of Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU, and further reinforced by Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 5 of 2021, which states that a peace settlement in bankruptcy can only be conducted once. Using a normative juridical method, this research analyzes the legal reasoning used by the panel of judges in approving the second peace settlement and evaluates its impact on legal certainty and protection for creditors, who are the affected parties in the bankruptcy process. The approval of a second peace settlement after the debtor is declared bankrupt creates legal uncertainty, as the existing provisions do not provide for more than one peace settlement. Additionally, this decision potentially harms creditors by prolonging the settlement of debts, which should have been clear, thus allowing room for misuse of legal procedures. The findings of the study show that the approval of this second peace settlement not only contradicts the fundamental principles of law but also risks harming creditors, who should be protected by the bankruptcy system to ensure their rights are fairly met. Therefore, this research suggests that consistent application of the law, in line with existing provisions, is necessary to uphold the principles of justice, legal certainty, and the credibility of the national bankruptcy system. Furthermore, reforms in regulations or law enforcement are needed to ensure that legal practices operate in accordance with principles that are fair and transparent.
Co-Authors Anita Afriana Charisa Dwi Santika Elisatris Gultom Fathia Ariandini Zulhian