Indrasatya Octavianus Nasirun
Universitas Negeri Manado

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Responsibility of PPK As An Agency In The Procurement of Goods and Services Engeli Yuliana Lumaing; Indrasatya Octavianus Nasirun; Yoan Barbara Runtunuwu; Novita Mongdong; Rusyandi Rusyandi; Romi Mesra
JURNAL PARADIGMA : Journal of Sociology Research and Education Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): (DESEMBER 2023) JURNAL PARADIGMA: Journal of Sociology Research and Education
Publisher : Labor Program Studi Pendidikan Sosiologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53682/jpjsre.v4i2.8069

Abstract

The person designated as the owner of the job by the Budget User or Power of Budget User and in charge of carrying out the acquisition of goods and services is known as the Commitment Maker Officer. Contract-based procurement operations necessitate a high level of comprehension and/or proficiency, beginning with the stages of purchase planning, purchase execution, control, contract signing, and reporting and submission of work results. As a result, the PPK acts as its representative when forming alliances or agreements with other parties; in the absence of the Office of the Commitment Maker, the instance is unable to do so. The Office of the Commitment Maker determines whether a procurement of goods and services within an agency is successful or unsuccessful. This indicates that the fundamental functions of the Office of Commitment Makers are intimately tied to the utilization of the State budget since their execution calls for a distinct set of skills, accountability, and rigor than those of another administrative officer. State losses from damage or other claim claims will arise from errors in the Office of the Commitment Maker's discharge of its obligations
Public Perception of Trust in the Legal System Based on Viral Legal Cases on Various Media in Indonesia Romi Mesra; Meiske Lasut; Indrasatya Octavianus Nasirun
Jurnal Mahkamah Hukum Vol 1 No 1 (2024): (May) Jurnal Mahkamah Hukum
Publisher : PT. NALURI EDUKASI PRESS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to investigate public perceptions of trust in the Indonesian legal system based on an analysis of three legal cases that went viral in various media. The cases selected were the Case of Brigadier J or Ferdy Sambo, the Case of Mario Dandy and the Son of a Tax Official, and the Corruption Case of the Ministry of Agriculture, Syahrul Yasin Limpo. This research uses a qualitative approach with literature study data collection methods. Data was obtained from news sources, articles, media reports, and related research that discussed these three cases. Analysis was carried out to identify general patterns, public perceptions, and implications for trust in the legal system. The research results show that the Brigadier J case raises doubts about the justice of the legal system, while the case of Mario Dandy and the Tax Official's Son strengthens perceptions about abuse of power and privilege, the Ministry of Agriculture corruption case shows the negative impact of corruption on public trust in the government and the legal system. The public feels injustice and a lack of trust in the integrity of the legal system, which can threaten the legitimacy of legal institutions.