Khoirul Anwar
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Failure of Good Faith in Mediating Divorce Cases in Religious Court Muhammad Saifullah; Khoirul Anwar; Ali Murtadho; Ferry Khusnul Mubarok; Cecep Soleh Kurniawan
International Journal Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din Vol 26, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/ihya.26.1.20313

Abstract

Divorce mediation carried out outside the court (community) and within court, institutions has yet to be effective even though the government has issued a Supreme Court Regulation regarding mediation in court. The achievement of mediation success, which is still below 5%, has encouraged the Supreme Court to add an article on good faith (article 7, Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016) as a principle of mediation and the threat of sanctions for parties who do not have good faith. This study aims to reveal how the good faith clause is implemented in resolving divorce conflicts through mediation and sanctions for parties who do not act in good faith at the Pekalongan Religious Court. The data mining method was carried out through interviews with mediators, mediator judges at the Pekalongan Religious Court area, parties to the conflict, and experts in the field of mediation. Data mining was carried out through observational and documentation of domestic conflict studies. The collected data was analyzed through descriptive analysis. This paper concludes that (1) the principles of mediation have not been fully carried out in good faith in resolving divorce conflicts through mediation outside the court, so mediation fails and results in the neglect of protracted conflict issues, (2) mediation in the majority of courts lack of success due to internal and external factors, and (3) the mediator or mediator judge experiences difficulties in implementing sanctions against parties who do not have good intentions in resolving family conflicts. This research recommends that outsied of the court mediation be carried out by professional mediators who support the success of the mediation process in the justice system.
Institutionalizing Waqf Literacy: A Critical Governance Analysis of the Indonesian Waqf Board’s Communication Strategies Ahmad Furqon; Khoirul Anwar; Nasrul Fahmi Zaki Fuadi; Yunita Dewi Septiana; Fatma Kacem
Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam UIN Walisongo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/economica.2024.15.2.31140

Abstract

Public understanding of waqf in Indonesia remains limited, constraining its socio-economic potential, and is often treated as a mere educational deficit rather than a governance issue. This study examines the role of the Indonesian Waqf Board (BWI) in enhancing waqf literacy by analyzing how literacy initiatives are designed, implemented, evaluated, and institutionally mediated within Indonesia’s waqf governance system. Using a qualitative, document-based descriptive review that integrates a conceptual–normative approach with comparative institutional analysis, the research draws on BWI Annual Reports (2019–2023), the BWI Strategic Plan (2020–2024), and peer-reviewed literature. The findings show that BWI emphasizes productive waqf, multi-channel digital dissemination, and empowerment-oriented narratives, yet evaluates effectiveness primarily through output-based indicators that undercapture comprehension, engagement, and trust formation. Literacy outcomes are further shaped by regulatory overlap, digital asymmetry, resource allocation patterns, and limited participatory mechanisms. The study concludes that waqf literacy is institutionally mediated and governance-driven, underscoring the need for stronger accountability design, evaluative reform, and regulatory coherence.