Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Gunardi Lie
Faculty of Law, Tarumanagara University, Indonesia
Aerospace Engineering Computer Science & IT Health Professions Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
IUS Constituendum Of Cross-Border Insolvency Regulation In Asean (Analysis Of The Uncitral Model Law On Cross-Border Insolvency And The European Union Regulation On Insolvency Proceedings) Andrian Andrian; Gunardi Lie
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): Journal Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v4i6.1400

Abstract

Currently, ASEAN has an economic integration program that is stated in the ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint. As is well known, the European Union is the only regional organization that has succeeded in creating economic integration in its region supported by a unified law. One of the legal unification that needs to be initiated by ASEAN in supporting its economic integration is cross-border insolvency regulation. Some international legal instruments that can be a reference for the establishment of the ASEAN Cross-border Insolvency Regulation include the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency and EU Regulation 848/2015 on Insolvency Proceedings. However, the comparison between ASEAN and the EU is not equivalent. ASEAN is a regional organization that is intergovernmental in nature, while the EU is a regional organization that is supranational in nature. Therefore, the comparative approach and statute approach are the right approaches in this article's writing. As for the research method used in this article writing is normative research. The objectives of this article are to describe the legal personality of ASEAN and the European Union in relation to the establishment of cross-border insolvency regulation and provide an overview of the substance of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency and EU Regulation 848/2015 to provide a reference for ASEAN to from cross-border insolvency regulation.
The Validity of Wiretapping as Evidence in Corruption Cases Denzel Andersson Cahyono; Gunardi Lie
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 6 No 2 (2024): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v6i2.1189

Abstract

Corruption crimes committed by state officials in Indonesia are rampant. Therefore, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), as an independent institution, has a heavy-duty to investigate the perpetrators of Corruption Crimes in Indonesia. Of course, the KPK in the trial requires strong evidence to reveal the perpetrators of special crimes, namely corruption. With this evidence, the KPK will be able to prove that the perpetrator is proven to have committed the crime of corruption It is known that the KPK Law has just been revised, Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission. Where there are changes in procedures listed in the new law. This refers to how the KPK can conduct wiretapping and obtain official permission to wiretap perpetrators who are indicated to have committed corruption crimes.
Co-Authors Andrian Andrian Denzel Andersson Cahyono