Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SHAHIH : Jurnal Ilmu Kewahyuan AT-TAHDIS: Journal of Hadith Studies
Ernawati Beru Ginting
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Arts Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
TAKHRIJ HADIS : ANALISIS KRITIK SANAD HADIS TANGAN DI ATAS LEBIH BAIK DARIPADA TANGAN DI BAWAH Ernawati Beru Ginting
SHAHIH (Jurnal Ilmu Kewahyuan) Vol 3, No 1 (2020): SHAHIH (Jurnal Ilmu Kewahyuan) Jan-Jun 2020
Publisher : UIN Sumatera Utara Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (726.121 KB) | DOI: 10.51900/shahih.v3i1.7723

Abstract

One branch of the science of hadith is takhrij al-hadith, through which we can trace the original source of the hadith. Because of the importance of this takhrij, the researchers tried to apply how the workings of this science. The object of this discussion is that the hadith about the hand above is better than the hand below. Through this method of takhrij, the researcher will reveal about several things related to the hadith that will be sought, namely: where the hadith is found, who the raw is, what the status of the sanad, and how the legal status in that hadith. So it is understood that the status of the narrators who narrated the hadith and also the status of the hadith. From this research it can be ascertained that the narrators whose siqah and hadith are valid and can be used as a basis in Islamic law
PEMIKIRAN MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA AL-A‘ZAMI TENTANG PENULISAN HADIS DAN JAWABAN TERHADAP KRITIK JOSEPH SCHACHT TENTANG KEAUTENTIKAN HADIS Ernawati Br Ginting
AT-TAHDIS: Journal of Hadith Studies Vol 1, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : UIN Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (133.411 KB)

Abstract

Abstrak: Penelitian ini akan membahas tentang pemikiran Muhammad Mustafa al-A‘zami seorang ahli hadis kontemporer yang dikenal dengan kajian kritisnya terhadap teori-teori orientalis Islam di Barat. Kemudian disandingkan dengan pendapat sarjana Barat, yang diwakili oleh Joseph Schacht. Sebagaimana pada penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pemikiran Muhammad Mustafa al-A‘zami tentang penulisan hadis dan jawaban terhadap kritik Joseph Schacht tentang keautentikan hadis. Dalam penelitian ini, peneliti menggunakan metode analisis. Peneliti menarik kesimpulan pertama yaitu bahwa menurut al-A‘zami telah adanya penulisan hadis Nabi di awal periode Islam, namun mengenai penulisan hadis di awal periode ini ada sebagian golongan yang mengingkari fakta tersebut. Kedua yaitu kritik yang dibuat Joseph Schacht bukan hal baru karena sebagaimana pengakuannya hanyalah penyambungan ide dari gagasan-gagasan orientalis seperti Ignaz Goldziher. Kata Kunci: kritik hadis, al-A‘zami, Joseph Schacht
PEMIKIRAN PROF. DR. KASSIM AHMAD DALAM MENGKAJI HADIS Ernawati Beru Ginting
SHAHIH (Jurnal Ilmu Kewahyuan) Vol 5, No 1 (2022): SHAHIH (Jurnal Ilmu Kewahyuan) Jan-Jun 2022
Publisher : UIN Sumatera Utara Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51900/shahih.v5i1.12548

Abstract

Kassim Ahmad is an intellectual from Malaysia who doubts the authenticity of the Prophet's hadith. Through his book Hadith: An Initial Assessment, Kassim Ahmad tries to explain his assumptions until he argues that hadith is a form of deviation from the teachings of the Prophet SAW and should not be accepted as a source of Islamic aqidah and sharia. However, he does not necessarily admit that he is a sunnah disbeliever. Kassim Ahmad is known as an anti-hadith who admits that he is Muslim and loves Islam, but does not believe that hadith comes from the Prophet and rejects hadith as a source of Islamic law. But in the end Kassim Ahmad accepted the hadith despite certain limitations.
Co-Authors