Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi sebagai Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik dalam Tindak Pidana Siber di Indonesia Gladys Amanda; Usman; Elizabeth Siregar
Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah : Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, Humaniora
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/alwatzikhoebillah.v12i1.5066

Abstract

This study examines the regulation and construction of corporate criminal liability in its capacity as an Electronic System Provider (ESP) regarding cybercrimes in Indonesia. The rapid development of information technology allows corporate platform providers to become the infrastructure for cybercrimes committed by users. The main issue lies in the legal vacuum regarding the limits of liability for corporations that are passive or engage in omission toward illegal content within the systems they manage. Using a normative legal research method, this study analyzes the synchronization between the ITE Law and the National Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023). The results indicate that current regulations still emphasize active corporate actions; thus, legal reforms are needed to regulate the parameters of liability for negligence or the failure of ESPs to prevent cybercrimes to ensure legal certainty and public protection.
PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA TERSANGKA TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME Eva Noviyana; Usman; Elizabeth Siregar
Berajah Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : CV. Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/bj.v6i1.227

Abstract

This study aims to examine the provisions for protecting the human rights of terrorism suspects in Law Number 5 of 2018 and to formulate a more balanced criminal law policy to address existing normative weaknesses. The background to this research is based on the widespread allegations of human rights violations during the arrest and detention of terrorism suspects, one example of which was the death of Siyono in 2016. This study uses a normative juridical method by examining primary legal materials in the form of laws and regulations, secondary legal materials in the form of literature and previous research, and tertiary legal materials to complement the analysis. The results indicate that although Article 25 paragraph (7) and Article 28 paragraph (3) of Law Number 5 of 2018 mandate respect for human rights during the arrest and detention process, the provisions on sanctions in Article 25 paragraph (8) and Article 28 paragraph (4) remain vague because they do not specifically specify the type and severity of sanctions. This ambiguity in norms creates legal uncertainty that contradicts the principle of lex certa, the theory of natural rights, and the principle of due process of law. This research concludes that Law Number 5 of 2018 has three structural weaknesses: the lack of firm sanctions for officials who violate human rights, the absence of an independent oversight body, and the lack of guaranteed legal assistance for suspects. Therefore, it is necessary to add new articles containing firm criminal and administrative sanctions, an independent judicial oversight mechanism, and the obligation to provide free legal assistance to terrorism suspects.