Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tali Jagad Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen
Andika Eka Prasetya
Prodi Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Dharma AUB Surakarta, Indonesia
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
KOMPENSASI, KERJASAMA TIM DAN KREATIVITAS BERDAMPAK TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN (STUDI KASUS DI MCDONALD’S AREA SOLO RAYA): Pengaruh Citra Merek, Kualitas Produk, Dan Harga Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Smartphone Xiaomi Di Kota Surakarta Yofhi Septian Panglipurningrum; Andika Eka Prasetya
TALI JAGAD JOURNAL Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): TALIJAGAD
Publisher : Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55732/unu.tjj.2023.01.4

Abstract

This study aims to examine compensation, teamwork and creativity on employee performance. Research conducted at McDonald's fast food company solo area in 2019. Samples taken in this study were 40 employees. The analysis technique in this study consisted of validity and reliability tests, classic assumption tests, multiple linear tests, t tests, F tests and R2 tests (coefficient of determination). The results of multiple linear regression tests can be seen that compensation, teamwork and creativity have a positive effect on the performance of McDonald’s Solo area employees. T test results can be seen that compensation, teamwork and creativity significantly influence the performance of McDonald's employees Solo Area. F test results can be seen that compensation, teamwork and creativity significantly influence the performance of McDonald's employees Solo Area. R2 test results (coefficient of determination) obtained Adjusted R2 value of 0.246 which means that the variable influence of compensation, teamwork and creativity on the performance of McDonald's employees Solo Area can be explained by 24.6%. While the remaining 75.4% is explained by other variables not included in the regression model, for example leadership, work environment and incentives.
Co-Authors Yofhi Septian Panglipurningrum