Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Horizon: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
Ulul Azqmi
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
DAMPAK KEBIJAKAN AGRARIA TERHADAP KETAHANAN PANGAN DI BERAU, KECAMATAN TALIYASAN Aditiya Bangun Triyuda; Rofiatul Afifah; Ulul Azqmi
Journal of Economic and Economic Policy Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Economic and Economic Policy
Publisher : PT ANTIS INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61796/ijecep.v1i2.26

Abstract

Kebijakan agraria di Indonesia memainkan peran penting dalam menentukan ketahanan pangan nasional. Artikel ini mengkaji dampak kebijakan agraria terhadap ketahanan pangan di Kabupaten Berau, Kalimantan Timur. Dengan meneliti implementasi kebijakan redistribusi lahan dan reforma agraria, studi ini mengevaluasi perubahan dalam produksi pertanian dan kesejahteraan petani di Berau. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan agraria di Berau berkontribusi signifikan terhadap peningkatan ketahanan pangan, meskipun masih menghadapi beberapa tantangan dalam implementasinya.
Epistemologi Hukum dan Konstruksi Penalaran Hakim dalam Dissenting Opinion Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Ulul Azqmi; Elviandri; Bayu Prasetyo
HORIZON: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): HORIZON: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary
Publisher : Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54373/hijm.v4i3.6581

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal epistemology, reasoning methods, and interpretive paradigms underlying the dissenting opinion in the decision. The study uses a normative legal method with a statutory, case, and legal philosophy approach. The primary legal materials include the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, and related laws and regulations. Secondary legal materials are obtained from books, scientific journals, and relevant legal documents. The analysis is conducted qualitatively through legal interpretation, analysis of legal arguments, and a study of legal philosophy to identify the epistemological basis and reasoning patterns used in the dissenting opinion. The results show that the dissenting opinion is built on a foundation of legal certainty and respect for an open legal policy as the limit of judicial authority. The minority judges consistently applied judicial restraint and criticized the Constitutional Court's shift to a positive legislative role. Furthermore, there are differing paradigms in interpreting the principle of equality before the law, demonstrating a conflict between formalistic approaches and substantive justice. These findings confirm that dissenting opinions are not merely a record of differing opinions, but serve as academic and constitutional instruments to uphold the principles of separation of powers and a democratic rule of law.  
Co-Authors Aditiya Bangun Triyuda Bayu Prasetyo Elviandri, Elviandri Rofiatul Afifah