Salva Dewi Ambarwati
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Relationship Between Risk Management, Non-Financial Performance Measurement, and Company Reputation in Integrated Reporting in State-Owned Banks in Indonesia Maria Yovita R. Pandin; Achmad Bagas Djuan Rajendra; Salma Dewi Ambarsari; Salva Dewi Ambarwati; Fillah Ardhi
Harmoni Economics: International Journal of Economics and Accounting Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): August: Harmoni Economics: International Journal of Economics and Accounting
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/harmonieconomics.v2i3.262

Abstract

This study looks at how integrated reporting (Y) is impacted by risk management (X1), non-financial performance (X2), and company reputation. The results of the first hypothesis test (H1) indicate that risk management (X1) significantly influences integrated reporting (Y) with a significance value of 0.634 (p>0.05). This means that the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected, indicating a significant contribution of X1 to Y. Conversely, the second hypothesis test (H2) shows that non-financial performance (X2) does not have a significant influence on integrated reporting (Y), with a significance value of 0.001 (p<0.05), so the null hypothesis (H0) is accepted and H2 is rejected. Similarly, the third hypothesis (H3) shows that corporate reputation (X3) does not have a significant effect on integrated reporting (Y) with a significance value of 0.000 (p<0.05), causing the null hypothesis (H0) to be accepted and H3 to be rejected. However, the simultaneous test (H4) reveals that risk management (X1), non-financial performance (X2), and company reputation (X3) collectively have a significant effect on integrated reporting (Y), as indicated by a significance level of 0.000 (p<0.05) and a calculated F value of 11.137, which is greater than the table F value of 3.443. This supports the acceptance of H4, indicating that although some variables are not significant individually, the combination of the three collectively contributes to explaining the variation in integrated reporting (Y).
Analisis Fundamental Makro, Fundamental Mikro, Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Struktur Kepemilikan, Kinerja Keuangan Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Salva Dewi Ambarwati; Hwihanus Hwihanus
Akuntansi Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Juni: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Akuntansi
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/akuntansi.v3i2.1996

Abstract

financial performance as an intervening variable, this study has is to determine how firm value is influenced by macro and micro fundamentals, ownership structure, and financial performance in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), this analysis technique uses Smart PLS version 4. Of the 9 hypotheses made, 4 hypotheses were accepted and 5 hypotheses were rejected. Financial performance and ownership structure have been shown to act as mediators between firm value, macro fundamentals, and micro fundamentals. Based on the findings, investors should consider ownership structure, micro fundamentals, macro fundamentals, and financial performance when making investment decisions. To increase its value, a business should also pay attention to its financial performance. Based on the findings of this study, in making investment decisions, investors should consider ownership structure, micro fundamentals, macro fundamentals, and financial performance. In addition, organizations need to focus on their financial performance to increase firm value.