Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementasi Prinsip-Prinsip Good Governance dalam Sektor Publik di Indonesia Deva Anasthalia; Nadia Rizqa Setyaningru; Lintang Savana; Keysya Aurelia Putri Zakiyyati
MISTER: Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research Vol. 1 No. 3b (2024): JULI (Tambahan)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS SERAMBI MEKKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32672/mister.v1i3b.1780

Abstract

Good governance merupakan konsep yang sangat penting dalam sektor publik, karena dapat meningkatkan efisiensi, transparansi, dan akuntabilitas dalam pemerintahan. penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi good governance di sektor publik di Indonesia melalui metode literature review. Sumber data diambil dari berbagai jurnal akademik yang diterbitkan sejak tahun 2018 hingga 2023. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun ada kemajuan dalam implementasi good governance, masih terdapat banyak tantangan yang harus dihadapi, termasuk korupsi, kurangnya partisipasi publik, dan kelemahan dalam sistem audit internal. Rekomendasi kebijakan yang disarankan mencakup peningkatan kapasitas institusional, penguatan sistem audit dan pengawasan, serta promosi transparansi dan partisipasi publik yang lebih besar. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi penting bagi pemahaman mengenai faktor-faktor yang mendukung dan menghambat penerapan good governance di Indonesia serta strategi yang dapat diterapkan untuk memperbaiki tata kelola pemerintahan di berbagai tingkatan.
Analisis Hukum Perikatan terhadap Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Kios: Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kupang Nomor 18/PDT.G/2016/PN.KPG Raras Santika Arianti; Deva Anasthalia; Lintang Savana; Keysya Aurelia Putri Zakiyyati
Mahalini: Journal of Business Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Mahalini: Journal of Business Law
Publisher : Universitas Wahid Hasyim

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the lack of clarity in legal considerations related to the case of kiosk seller default, which has the potential to cause legal uncertainty for the community. By analyzing this case, we can examine the application of the principles of contract law, such as the principle of freedom of contract and legal certainty, while also providing academic contributions in the form of critical evaluations of the decision. This study is also relevant to understanding how a sale and purchase agreement should be formulated to protect the rights and obligations of the parties, as well as to provide constructive suggestions for better legal practice. The research method used is normative juridical, which analyzes library materials or secondary data. In addition, a data triangulation method is applied to validate and improve the reliability of information by collecting data from various sources. This approach aims to gain a more comprehensive understanding and reduce bias that may arise from relying on one source or method. The conclusion is that: 1) The judge's considerations in deciding the case of default have been in accordance with applicable provisions based on the regulations; 2) The form of default is the delay and inconsistency between the agreement and the implementation of the agreement itself; and 3) The legal consequences received by Mrs. Dorce include payment of the remaining price of the kiosk, legal costs, responsibility for losses, and delay in recognizing ownership rights until her obligations are fulfilled.