Zainurrahman Zainurrahman
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

EXAMINING BING AI AS A SOLUTION TO EFL WRITING FEEDBACK CHALLENGES Zainurrahman Zainurrahman; Rojab Siti Rodliyah
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2024
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to examine Bing AI (also known as Bing Chat or Copilot) as a feedback agent, focusing on responses to predetermined prompts related to the content score of a research abstract. Two prompts were systematically input, resulting in extended non-corrective feedback from Bing AI which was sensitive to the prompt wording. This study was motivated by challenges in EFL writing feedback provision. Difficulties that teachers face, limitations of peer feedback, and potential drawbacks of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tools were briefly discussed. The results indicate that Bing AI is a promising feedback agent, offering insights into overcoming challenges in feedback provision, specifically in EFL writing instruction. The limitations of the study are also briefly discussed, as well as recommendations for future studies.
A review of Grammarly studies in the EFL context in Indonesia Zainurrahman Zainurrahman; Rojab Siti Rodliyah; Emi Emilia
EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture Vol 11, No 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/e.11.1.86-106

Abstract

Grammarly has been a popular automated writing evaluation (AWE) tool incorporated in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing instruction. Grammarly studies have also proliferated. However, the trends of Grammarly studies in this context have not been captured sufficiently. To fill this gap, this study reviews the trends of Grammarly studies in Indonesia, classifying published studies from 2014 to 2024 (the search occurred in March 2024). To this end, Grammarly studies were retrieved from the Sinta database and Google Scholar via Publish or Perish 8. The inclusion criteria determined that 11 studies were to be included. Using content analysis, research types, topics, instruments, methods, and key findings are classified and reported. The analysis showed that qualitative research was the most widely used method, followed by quantitative research. Meanwhile, research and development (R&D) and classroom action research (CAR) are extremely scant. Additionally, most studies have focused more on students’ perception of Grammarly than its actual performance. These findings suggest that further CAR-based, experimental, and correlational studies on the use of Grammarly in Indonesia are needed to address the research gaps identified. The study provides useful insights that can serve as a basis for future research on the use of Grammarly in language teaching and applied linguistics, especially in Indonesia.