Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PALITA: Journal of Social - Religion Research Journal of Islamic World and Politics
Mustahyun, Mustahyun
IAIN Palopo
Religion Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
DINAMIKA KONFLIK SUNNI-SYIAH DI INDONESIA PRESPEKTIF KUASA MICHEL FOUCAULT Sultriana, Sultriana; Mustahyun, Mustahyun
PALITA Vol 2, No 2 (2017): PALITA : Journal of Social Religion Research
Publisher : IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/pal.v2i2.109

Abstract

Sunnis and Syi’ah are two mazhab (Islamic schools ) that often argue in some aspects such as the perspective of the khilafah. Sunni is the majority in Indonesia. It naturally has ego power to do injustice such as pressing and even attacking which Sunni thinks disagree on what Sunni’s members believe, because according to them, their belief is something right. With that understanding, those who are opposed to their counterparts in this case Syiah as a minority will be cornered and even intimidated by the Sunni’s majority. In view of the problem, the writer used Michel Foucaults analysis of his theory of "power", how the majority hold the power over the minorities, resulting in labeling, suppression and even physical violence.
Rivalitas Arab Saudi Dan Iran Di Timur Tengah Pada Arab Spring Suriah Tahun 2011-2016 Mustahyun, Mustahyun
Journal of Islamic World and Politics Vol 1, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1069.547 KB) | DOI: 10.18196/jiwp.1105

Abstract

Conflicts have never been far from Middle East. Arab Saudi and Iran actively involve in the conflict In order to maintain their hegemony and national interest such as in Syria. For instance, in the Arab Spring both countries involved in the proxy war. Saudi supports the opposition movement asking for revolution and resignation of Basar regime while Iran totally supports the Bashar al-Assad. The involvement of both countries in Syria’s conflict shows the strategic position of Syria in order to keep Saudi’s and Iran’s interest and their political power at Middle East. This study aims to explore rivalry of Saudi and Iran at Syria especially in the Arab Spring from 2011 to 2016. There are two main issues to discuss in this study namely how Saudi and Iran participate in the conflict and what is the national interest of both countries encouraging them to participate in the conflict.Timur Tengah tidak pernah lepas dari konflik. Arab Saudi dan Iran seringkali menjadi aktor yang terlibat konflik. Keterlibatan mereka karena kepentingan national, seperti yang terjadi di Suriah. Konflik Suriah berawal dari gejolak Arab Spring dan menjadi arena Proxy War antara kubu Arab Saudi dan kubu Iran. Arab Saudi mendukung perlawanan Oposisi terhadap rezim, sedangkan Iran totalitas mendukung Presiden Bashar al-Assad. Dukungan Arab Saudi dan Iran dalam bentuk finansial dan militer. Kehadiran Arab Saudi dan Iran, menegaskan bahwa Suriah sebagai wilayah yang sangat strategis dalam mencapai pengaruh politik di Timur Tengah. Tulisan ini bertujuan melihat Rivalitas Arab Saudi dan Iran di Suriah pada peristiwa gejolak Arab Spring tahun 2011-2016. Rivalitas kedua negara tersebut dalam rangka mencapai kepentingan nasional.
Co-Authors Sultriana, Sultriana