Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Law and Legal Reform International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia
Sucihatiningsih Dian Wisika Prajanti
Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
A Comparative Legal Analysis of Competition Law Protections for MSMEs in ASEAN Member States R. Benny Riyanto; Sucihatiningsih Dian Wisika Prajanti; Dina Silvia Puteri
International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January-June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ildisea.v4i2.36142

Abstract

This research analyzes the adequacy of legal protection for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) against trade monopoly practices within the rapidly evolving digital market landscape of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era. Although Indonesia’s Law Number 5 of 1999 provides preventive safeguards—such as prohibitions on anti-competitive agreements under Articles 5–8—and repressive mechanisms through administrative and criminal sanctions under Articles 30–37, these provisions remain structurally limited in addressing digital-platform dominance and algorithm-driven market distortions. The normative gap between traditional competition law and contemporary digital market realities necessitates a reassessment of MSME protection. Employing a normative legal research design with a statute approach, conceptual approach, comparative approach, and law-and-policy analysis, this study evaluates whether Indonesia’s current framework sufficiently responds to digital-era challenges. Comparative examination of Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand demonstrates more adaptive regulatory models that integrate digital market oversight into competition law—evident in Malaysia’s Competition Act 2010 and MyDIGITAL Blueprint, Singapore’s enforcement by the Competition and Consumer Commission (CCCS) over dominant online platforms, and Thailand’s Trade Competition Act 2017, aligned with Thailand 4.0. These jurisdictions illustrate a functional convergence toward platform regulation, data transparency, and digital market fairness. This research argues that Indonesia must harmonize its competition policy with digital transformation by adopting platform-specific rules, strengthening algorithmic accountability, and integrating MSME-focused digital market protections. By situating business competition law within the broader digital-economy governance discourse, the study contributes a socio-legal and policy-oriented framework for promoting equitable and sustainable market participation for MSMEs in ASEAN’s digitalized economy.
Optimizing Expertise through Commercial Intellectual Property Achievement to Support Research Output Downstreaming: External Aspects in Policy Reform R Benny Riyanto; Sucihatiningsih Dian Wisika Prajanti; Nurul Fibrianti; Karsinah Karsinah
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Justice and Law Reform in Various Perspectives
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.vol5i2.6455

Abstract

This study investigates the optimization of faculty expertise by leveraging commercial intellectual property (IP) achievements to facilitate the downstreaming of research outputs. It explores how universities can enhance their research impact and contribute to societal and economic development by effectively commercializing their intellectual assets. Emphasizing external aspects in policy reform, the research examines the intricate intersection of academia, industry, and legal frameworks. By aligning academic endeavors with policy reform initiatives, universities can create a conducive environment for knowledge transfer and innovation diffusion. This paper underscores the significance of integrating commercial IP achievements into academic practices to bridge the gap between research and real-world applications. Through strategic partnerships with industry and effective utilization of legal mechanisms, universities can maximize the commercial potential of their intellectual assets. Furthermore, by fostering a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship among faculty members, universities can drive impactful research outcomes that address societal challenges and fuel economic growth. The findings suggest that policymakers play a crucial role in shaping the regulatory landscape to incentivize and support commercialization efforts within academia. By implementing policies that streamline IP management processes and provide adequate funding and infrastructure support, governments can foster a vibrant innovation ecosystem that promotes collaboration between academia and industry. Ultimately, this study advocates for a holistic approach to research commercialization that integrates academic, industrial, and policy perspectives to maximize societal benefits and promote sustainable development.
Co-Authors Dina Silvia Puteri Karsinah Karsinah Nurul Fibrianti R Benny Riyanto R. Benny Riyanto