Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of Sustainability Mindset in MSMEs-A Qualitative Study Annisa Yumna Ulfah; Ida Ariyani; Arie Wibowo Khurniawan
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Vol. 5 No. 7 (2024): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jist.v5i7.1214

Abstract

A mindset based on Sustainability principles can guide MSME managers to move towards transformative changes that can minimize risks such as landfilling, and realize the linkage between business and business carried out with the surrounding environment. The qualitative research was conducted by interview and direct observation methods on the owners of Güzel Dish MSMEs located in East Kotawaringin, Central Kalimantan with guidance from the Sustainability Mindset Indicator by Isabel Rimanoczy. The research found that Güzel Dish's MSME managers have partially implemented indicators of a sustainable mindset
The Influence of Work Motivation, Compensation, and Work Engagement on Performance with Job Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable at the Central Statistics Agency of Central Kalimantan Province Waluyo Wicaksono; Ida Ariyani; Ami Pujiwati
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v5i3.1085

Abstract

This study examines the influence of Work Motivation, Compensation, and Work Involvement on Performance, mediated by Job Satisfaction, among employees of the Central Statistics Agency of Central Kalimantan Province. Employing a quantitative, correlational approach, the research involved 380 employees, with 170 respondents selected using a saturated sampling technique. Data were gathered through questionnaires and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) via AMOS, supported by descriptive analysis with Microsoft Excel and SPSS. Descriptive results indicate that the average responses for Performance, Job Satisfaction, Work Motivation, and Compensation were categorized as “agree,” while Work Involvement was rated “strongly agree.” The modified AMOS model produced the following structural equations: Job Satisfaction (KEP) = -0.002?Work Motivation (MK) - 0.025?Compensation (KOM) + 0.918?Work Involvement (KK), R²?=?0.802; Performance (KIN) = 0.776?Job Satisfaction (KEP) + 0.095?Work Motivation (MK) + 0.180?Compensation (KOM) - 0.017?Work Involvement (KK), R²?=?0.901. The findings reveal that Work Motivation does not significantly influence Job Satisfaction and does not directly affect Performance, though it has an indirect impact through Job Satisfaction. Job Satisfaction significantly affects Performance, while Compensation shows no significant relationship with either variable. Work Engagement strongly affects Job Satisfaction but not Performance. Collectively, Work Motivation, Compensation, and Work Involvement explain 80.2% of Job Satisfaction variance and 90.1% of Performance variance.