Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Law Enforcement Against Hit-And-Run Cases And The Role Of The Police In Prevention And Prosecution Rio Saputra; Novritsar Hasitongan Pakpahan; Didit Darmawan; Lutfi Yustyanto Sulaiman; Rio Harton
Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Vol. 22 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Pengurus Pusat Perkumpulan Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara Indonesia (PIANI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63309/dialektika.v22i3.487

Abstract

Abstract This research aims to analyze law enforcement and moral responsibility in hit-and-run cases as well as the role of the police in preventing traffic accidents. The approach used is descriptive qualitative with the method of document analysis of applicable regulations, literature review, and interpretation of the effectiveness of the policies applied. The results showed that hit-and-run is a criminal offense that has serious legal consequences, as stipulated in Law Number 22 of 2009. The police have a role to take preventive action through socialization and traffic surveillance, as well as repressive action by conducting investigations, arrests, and legal proceedings against the perpetrators. The main factors that encourage hit-and-runs include the perpetrator's fear of legal consequences, panic at the scene, and low public awareness of moral responsibility. The impact is not only in the form of physical and material losses, but also a deep psychosocial impact on victims and their families. Therefore, it is necessary to increase legal awareness in the community and optimize cooperation between the police and related institutions in order to reduce the number of road accidents and violations of the law. Keywords: Accident, Hit-and-run, Law enforcement, Moral responsibility, Police, Prevention Traffic safety,
Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi: Tantangan Dan Langkah-Langkah Konkret Muchamad Catur Rizky; Didit Darmawan; Suwito Suwito; Rio Saputra; Novritsar Hasitongan Pakpahan
Jurnal Manuhara : Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Oktober : Jurnal Manuhara : Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Manajemen Kewirausahaan dan Bisnis Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/manuhara.v1i4.726

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia is a chronic problem that damages the social and economic structure of the country. This paper explores the history of corruption from feudal times to the modern era, highlighting corrupt practices as part of the culture of government. The government has taken serious steps by establishing anti-corruption regulations and institutions to eradicate corruption that harms society and the state. This research uses the literature study method with a focus on improving governance and increasing transparency as an effort to prevent corruption. Through qualitative analysis, this research evaluates the effectiveness of existing anti-corruption regulations and institutions, as well as understanding the impact of corruption on people's social and economic rights. The results show that the government has taken concrete steps, such as establishing the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and encouraging the use of information technology. However, the fight against corruption is faced with structural, cultural, instrumental and management barriers. Measures to improve governance and increase transparency are key to preventing corruption. Challenges include organized corruption, corrupt practices in the private sector, and non-compliance with regulations. Lack of resources is a constraint, and corruption in complex bureaucratic systems complicates case handling. Improving coordination, transparency, and public participation is needed to overcome these challenges. The government needs to continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of corruption-fighting measures. Regular evaluation, public participation, and human resource capacity building are key to creating a strong and resilient system against corrupt practices. Collective awareness and cooperation between the government, anti-corruption organizations, and society are essential to build an Indonesia that is clean from corruption and just for all its people.