A Hashfi Luthfi
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Internalisasi Nilai Keadilan dan Kesetaraan Gender dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam (Sebuah Strategi Pembangunan Indonesia Emas Berkelanjutan 2045) Firqah Annajiyah Mansyuroh; A Hashfi Luthfi
ISLAMITSCH FAMILIERECHT JOURNAL Vol 3 No 02 (2022): Islamitsch Familierecht Journal
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32923/ifj.v3i02.2755

Abstract

In line with Indonesia's Golden Vision 2045, many aspects must be considered, including gender equality and awareness. Until now, the level of gender equality in Indonesia is still low. Islam is often the scapegoat in the issue of gender equality in the family and society in Indonesia. Whereas in the Compilation of Islamic Law it is clear that the values of justice and gender equality should be the reference for Indonesian society. This paper wants to explain that the internalization of the values of justice and gender equality in Islamic family law can be one of the development strategies of Indonesia Gold for Sustainable 2045. It can be concluded that KHI is sufficient to show equality between men and women in family life and apply it in everyday life, becoming the key to Indonesia's development.
MEDIASI SEBAGAI ALTERNATIVE DISPITE RESULOTION TERHADAP PERKARA PERCERAIAN A Hashfi Luthfi; Firqah Annajiyah Mansyuroh
ISLAMITSCH FAMILIERECHT JOURNAL Vol 3 No 02 (2022): Islamitsch Familierecht Journal
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32923/ifj.v3i02.2756

Abstract

The judicial system in Indonesia has recognized mediation as an alternative dispute resolution. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia through Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) Number 01 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts has integrated mediation into the proceedings in court. as an instrument to overcome the accumulation of cases. This mediation is applied as part of the event in civil cases in the religious courts and general courts. All civil disputes submitted to the court of first intance must first be resolved throught reconciliation with the help of a mediator, namely a neutral party who assists the parties in the negotiation process in order to seek various possible dispute resolitions without resorting to a way of deciding or completing a case settlement. This study uses a normative juridical approach by using data collection techniques through library research methods. The results of this study is factors that influence the success of mediation include the disputing parties, the problem that causes the dispute and the quality of the third party or mediator.
Reconstructing Zakat Governance in Indonesia: A Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah Approach to Constitutional Reform A Hashfi Luthfi; Ali Sodiqin; Moh. Tamtowi
Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/alahkam.v11i1.13033

Abstract

Recent reforms in Indonesia’s zakat governance have intensified debates concerning the balance between state authority and civil society participation, particularly following Constitutional Court Decisions No. 97/PUU-XXII/2024 and No. 54/PUU-XXIII/2025. Existing studies on zakat governance have predominantly emphasized managerial efficiency, institutional performance, and administrative accountability, while paying limited attention to the constitutional implications of zakat regulation and its alignment with the normative objectives of Islamic law. This study addresses this gap by examining how zakat governance in Indonesia can be reconstructed through the integration of constitutional principles, good governance, and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. The study aims to examine the extent to which the current zakat management framework aligns with the objectives of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, evaluate the institutionalization of good governance principles, and formulate a participatory governance model that balances state authority with civil society involvement. Employing a normative legal research design, this study utilizes statutory, conceptual, and maqāṣidī approaches through doctrinal analysis of Law No. 23 of 2011 on Zakat Management and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s zakat governance remains structurally centralized under BAZNAS, generating institutional imbalances and weakening participatory accountability. Although the Constitutional Court upheld the legality of the current framework, it simultaneously mandated reforms to strengthen transparency, accountability, and public participation. This study proposes a maqāṣid-based good zakat governance model grounded in dual oversight and institutional checks and balances to promote distributive justice, public welfare, and sustainable zakat governance.