Sujono
Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma University

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

REFORMULASI KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP UJARAN KEBENCIAN DI MEDIA SOSIAL : STUDI KOMPARATIF ANTARA KUHP DAN UU ITE Arif Purnama Hasyim; Sujono
LEX LAGUENS: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): LEX LAGUENS: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan (Agustus)
Publisher : YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN DAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RAHMAT HUSADA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.08221/lexlaguens.v3i2.270

Abstract

This research analyzes the regulatory challenges of hate speech in Indonesia through a comparative study between the Criminal Code and Electronic Information and Transaction Law, and their implications for protecting freedom of expression. Using a normative juridical method with a legal comparison approach, this study identifies regulatory fragmentation, unclear definitive parameters, and implementation inconsistencies that potentially create legal uncertainty. The findings reveal that the Criminal Code applies a conventional perspective based on public order protection, while the Electronic Information and Transaction Law tends to focus on protecting certain identity groups but with ambiguous formulations. The implementation of both legal instruments shows a pattern of selectivity that potentially distorts the democratic function of freedom of expression. The research recommends a comprehensive policy reformulation including: operational definitions based on Rabat Plan of Action parameters, a tiered approach in handling cases, harmonization between legal instruments, integration of digital platform roles, strengthening law enforcement capacity, and enhancing public digital literacy. The ideal model of hate speech criminalization policy must balance the interests of protecting vulnerable groups with guarantees of freedom of expression, considering Indonesia's multicultural context and international standards for legitimate restrictions on freedom of expression.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANGGOTA TNI (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN MILITER III-17 MANADO NOMOR 58-K/PM.III-17/AD/IX/2024) Bagus Priambodo Nur Sasongko; Sujono
LEX LAGUENS: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): LEX LAGUENS: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan (Agustus)
Publisher : YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN DAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RAHMAT HUSADA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.08221/lexlaguens.v3i2.272

Abstract

Persecution is one of the phenomena that is difficult to disappear in social life. Nowadays we often hear news cases of persecution committed by Indonesian army against civilians, as the author raises in this paper based on the Decision of Military Court III-17 Manado Number 58-K/PM.III-17/AD/IX/2024. The crime of maltreatment or commonly known as mishandeling is regulated in Article 351 of the Indonesia Criminal Code, while the regulation of the crime of maltreatment based on Indonesia Criminal Code 2023 listed in Article 466. The criminal offence of maltreatment is not regulated in Indonesia Military Criminal Code so that the criminal sanction still refers to the Criminal Code. In the decision of the Military Court III-17 Manado Number 58-K/PM.III-17/AD/IX/2024, according to the author, both the Military Oditur's charges and the Judge's decision were too lenient, the defendant should have been subject to the maximum penalty, considering that the perpetrator is a Indonesian Army who should provide a sense of security to the civilian community. It is necessary to evaluate and reformulate the laws and regulations governing military justice, especially regarding jurisdiction over general criminal offences committed by Indonesian Army in non-service situations. The verdict should reflect justice for the victim, as well as provide a deterrent effect for the perpetrator and other Indonesian Army, in order to prevent the repetition of similar criminal offences in the future.