Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.663
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Jurnal Hukum Sehasen JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum JURNAL KELUARGA SEHAT SEJAHTERA International Journal of Society and Law
ABDUL RAHMAN MAULANA SIREGAR
Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

 1   2 
ANALISIS NORMATIF PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA MEDIS DALAM PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN DOKTER SPESIALIS BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG KESEHATAN Farlin Subeki; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
JURNAL KELUARGA SEHAT SEJAHTERA Vol 22, No 1 (2024): JURNAL KELUARGA SEHAT SEJAHTERA
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/jkss.v22i1.62338

Abstract

Pertanggungjawaban peserta Pendidikan dokter spesialis dalam pelayanan Kesehatan menimbulkan kompleksitas dalam Undang-undang Kesehatan. Meskipun mendukung pendidikan medis memunculkan ketidakjelasan dalam tanggungjawab hukum, pengawasan praktik medis dan penyelesaian sengketa termasuk melalui majelis disiplin profesi. Digunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis data dari bahan hukum seperti konsep, teori, doktrin dan pendapat ahli. Dalam sistem penyelesaian sengketa medis, Undang-undang Kesehatan menimbulkan kompleksitas karena ketentuan mengenai kerjasama rumah sakit pendidikan dan perguruan tinggi dalam pendidikan medis serta tanggungjawab peserta didik dalam praktik medis berpotensi membingungkan dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa. Seperti kasus Siska Makatey menunjukkan pentingnya pengawasan ketat untuk mencegah malpraktik oleh peserta didik diluar kompetensinya
Legal Certainty in the Legislative System in Indonesia study on the Information and Electronic Transactions Law Hempi Wanty Saragih; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
International Journal of Society and Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Multidimensi Kreatif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal certainty is a fundamental element in the legal system that aims to create justice, order, and predictability in society. However, in practice, the existence of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) often causes polemics due to multiple interpretations and inconsistent application. This study aims to examine the aspects of legal certainty in the ITE Law by highlighting articles that are in the public spotlight, such as related to insult and defamation, as well as their technical implementation in the field. The research method used is juridical-normative with an analytical approach to the text of the law and juridical-empirical through case studies and interviews with legal practitioners. The results of the study show that legal uncertainty in the ITE Law is caused by the lack of harmonization between the ITE Law and other laws, weak public understanding of regulations, and uneven implementation by law enforcement officials. To create better legal certainty, revisions to articles with multiple interpretations, capacity building for law enforcement officials, and comprehensive public education about the ITE Law are needed. This research is expected to make a theoretical contribution to the development of legal studies in Indonesia as well as a basis for recommendations for policymakers in improving the quality of legislation.
The Uniqueness of Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution Method Outside the Court in Resolving Various Customary Disputes in Simalungun Regency Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.5004

Abstract

Mediation as an alternative dispute resolution outside the court has its own uniqueness in resolving various customary disputes. Generally, when a dispute arises between parties, the community tends to be more familiar with resolving disputes through customary means, or what they refer to as mediation. Mediation is a term commonly used by the community when disputes occur. Thus, mediation as an alternative dispute resolution holds a unique position among the people, particularly in Simalungun Regency, in resolving various customary disputes without the involvement of the courts. This article will further discuss the uniqueness of mediation in resolving customary disputes, the advantages and disadvantages of applying mediation as an alternative dispute resolution outside the court in Simalungun Regency. The importance of establishing mediation as an effective method for alternative dispute resolution outside the court for various customary disputes lies in its easy procedures, active involvement of the disputing parties, and respect for customary values and norms in maintaining social harmony and prioritizing win-win solutions. Moreover, mediation not only provides a practical and efficient solution but also helps to strengthen social relationships and preserve local cultural continuity. Therefore, mediation is considered a suitable and beneficial means for resolving customary disputes, offering a more familial approach compared to court resolution processes.
RECONSTRUCTION OF LEGAL FINDINGS AND REASONING ON ACEH'S LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY WITHIN THE FRAME WORK OF SPECIAL AUTONOMY Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Musannif
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4885

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the process of legal discovery and reasoning by the Aceh People's Representative Council (DPRA) in drafting qanuns, the extent to which these qanuns are in accordance with national laws and general legal principles, and the legal and social obstacles that arise in their implementation. The study uses a qualitative, normative-empirical method, with a literature study approach, semi-structured interviews with DPRA members, legal academics, and community leaders, and observations of the implementation of qanuns in the field. The results show that the Aceh DPRA applies legal reasoning to interpret national legal norms and adapt them to the local Acehnese context, and uses legal discovery to fill gaps or overlapping regulations. Although most qanuns are in line with the Aceh Special Autonomy Law and general legal principles, there are several qanuns that create potential legal conflicts with national regulations. Obstacles to qanun implementation include inconsistencies in norms, limited apparatus capacity, the complexity of qanuns for the community, and the lack of effective oversight mechanisms. The strategy of reconstructing legal discovery and reasoning through the integration of normative studies, empirical evaluation, and multi-stakeholder participation has been proven to be able to improve the quality of Aceh's legislation, ensuring that qanuns are more relevant, effective, and have legal and social legitimacy.
Legal Analysis of Debt Collector Case Settlement Through Restorative Justice at The Police Level Kevin Maisyan Rizaldi Mendrofa; Ismaidar Ismaidar; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Vol 5, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Utan Kayu Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/jrssh.v5i4.606

Abstract

Debt collection practices by debt collectors in the consumer finance industry often raise legal issues, particularly when carried out through intimidation, threats, or the seizure of collateral without proper legal procedures. This situation causes the civil legal relationship between the debtor and the financing company to develop into a criminal case requiring law enforcement. In police practice, the resolution of such cases is often directed through restorative justice mechanisms as an alternative to criminal cases, as long as they comply with the provisions stipulated in the Republic of Indonesia National Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021. This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of the application of restorative justice in resolving debt collector cases at the police level and examine the position and responsibility of leasing companies regarding the actions of authorized debt collectors. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory, conceptual, and case-based approach. The results show that restorative justice can only be applied to debt collector cases that are minor in nature, do not cause serious injuries, and the losses can be recovered through an agreement between the parties. Furthermore, the leasing company remains legally responsible for the actions of debt collectors as its extension, both in civil and criminal aspects. Therefore, the implementation of restorative justice must be carried out proportionally and still ensure legal protection for victims
The Role of the Police in Combating the Crime of Theft with Violence within the Jurisdiction of the Aceh Tenggara Resort Police Abdi Ridho; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Ismaidar Ismaidar
Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Vol 5, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Utan Kayu Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/jrssh.v5i4.584

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of the Police in addressing violent theft crimes and the obstacles faced by the Aceh Tenggara Police Resort. The research uses an empirical method with a qualitative descriptive approach. Data were obtained through observation, interviews with police personnel, and documentation related to crime prevention efforts. Data analysis was conducted by examining the roles, strategies, and challenges faced in the implementation of police duties. The results show that the role of the Aceh Tenggara Police Resort is carried out in an integrated manner through preemptive, preventive, and repressive efforts, including legal guidance and public awareness programs, routine patrols in high-risk areas, and law enforcement from investigation to prosecution. The support of Bhabinkamtibmas and active community cooperation enhances the effectiveness of prevention and case resolution, thereby maintaining public security and order. The obstacles faced include limited personnel and infrastructure, difficult-to-access geographical conditions, and technical investigation challenges, such as insufficient evidence and uncooperative witnesses. To overcome these challenges, the Aceh Tenggara Police Resort optimizes investigation management, personnel assignment, cross-functional coordination, persuasive approaches, technology utilization, and regular evaluation of investigations
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan yang Membebaskan Terdakwa dari Segala Tuntutan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby) Rio Aginta Ginting; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Suci Ramadani
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 12 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i12.2532

Abstract

Putusan bebas (vrijspraak) dalam perkara tindak pidana pembunuhan merupakan salah satu bentuk putusan yang sering menimbulkan perdebatan karena berkaitan dengan perlindungan hak terdakwa di satu sisi dan pemenuhan rasa keadilan bagi korban serta masyarakat di sisi lain. Perbedaan penafsiran terhadap unsur kesengajaan, hubungan kausalitas, dan standar pembuktian menyebabkan putusan bebas dalam perkara pembunuhan menjadi isu penting dalam perkembangan hukum pidana Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penerapan hukum pidana dan pertimbangan hukum majelis hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby yang membebaskan terdakwa dari dakwaan tindak pidana pembunuhan. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, doktrin hukum, serta literatur ilmiah yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan bebas dijatuhkan karena majelis hakim menilai unsur kesengajaan, hubungan kausalitas, dan pembuktian tidak terpenuhi secara sah dan meyakinkan sebagaimana dipersyaratkan dalam Pasal 183 KUHAP, sehingga diterapkan asas in dubio pro reo. Namun, pada tingkat kasasi Mahkamah Agung menilai telah terjadi kekeliruan penerapan hukum oleh judex facti karena fakta persidangan dan alat bukti telah cukup membuktikan terpenuhinya unsur penganiayaan yang mengakibatkan kematian berdasarkan Pasal 351 ayat (3) KUHP. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perbedaan penilaian terhadap alat bukti, unsur kesalahan, dan hubungan kausalitas menjadi faktor utama terjadinya disparitas putusan antar tingkat peradilan, sehingga diperlukan konsistensi penerapan prinsip pembuktian dan pertimbangan hukum untuk mewujudkan kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia.
Analisis Penalaran Hukum Petugas Pemasyarakatan dalam Pemenuhan Hak Narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Binjai Nadia Novitri Hasibuan; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Dio Dera Darmawan; Musannif
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 06 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i06.2029

Abstract

Pemenuhan hak narapidana merupakan bagian integral dari sistem pemasyarakatan yang berorientasi pada pembinaan dan penghormatan terhadap hak asasi manusia. Dalam praktiknya, pemenuhan hak tersebut tidak hanya ditentukan oleh norma hukum tertulis, tetapi juga sangat dipengaruhi oleh penalaran hukum petugas pemasyarakatan sebagai pelaksana kebijakan di tingkat operasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penalaran hukum petugas pemasyarakatan dalam pemenuhan hak narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Binjai serta menilai kesesuaiannya dengan prinsip sistem pemasyarakatan dan asas keadilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan hukum normatif-empiris dengan sifat deskriptif-analitis. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan dan wawancara dengan petugas pemasyarakatan yang terlibat dalam pengambilan keputusan terkait pemenuhan hak narapidana. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penalaran hukum petugas pemasyarakatan tidak hanya berlandaskan pada ketentuan normatif, tetapi juga dipengaruhi oleh pertimbangan administratif, keamanan lembaga, dan pengalaman praktis petugas. Variasi dalam penafsiran dan penggunaan diskresi berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakkonsistenan dalam pemenuhan hak narapidana, yang berdampak pada kepastian hukum dan keadilan substantif. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya penguatan kualitas penalaran hukum petugas pemasyarakatan agar pemenuhan hak narapidana dapat dilaksanakan secara lebih konsisten, objektif, dan selaras dengan tujuan sistem pemasyarakatan.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana bagi Anak sebagai Pengedar Narkotika (Studi Putusan Nomor 46/Pid.Sus-Anak/2025/PN Mdn) Haykal Ramadhan Adrianto; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Redyanto Sidi
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 09 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i09.2256

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis mekanisme tanggung jawab pidana anak yang bertindak sebagai pelaku perdagangan narkotika melalui studi kasus Keputusan Nomor 46/Pid.SusAnak/2025/PN Mdn di lingkungan pengadilan anak. Kerangka teori yang digunakan adalah pendekatan hukum perlindungan anak dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak dan teori tanggung jawab pidana yang mencakup unsur-unsur kesalahan (dolus/culpa), kapasitas bertanggung jawab, dan tidak adanya alasan pembenaran. Metode penelitian adalah yuridis normatif dengan analisis deskriptif dan studi kasus keputusan tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam keputusan tersebut, majelis hakim mempertimbangkan status anak dalam konteks pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, tetapi juga harus memperhatikan ketentuan sanksi dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika untuk tindak pidana terkait perdagangan narkotika. Tanggung jawab pidana anak dalam konteks perdagangan narkotika terdapat dilema antara upaya rehabilitasi dan proses represif, terutama ketika terbukti bahwa anak-anak memiliki kapasitas untuk bertindak tetapi juga berada dalam situasi rentan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa penerapan tanggung jawab pidana terhadap anak sebagai pelaku perdagangan narkotika harus dilakukan secara seimbang antara perlindungan hak-hak anak dan penegakan hukum pidana substantif tentang narkotika, dengan rekomendasi agar hakim lebih menekankan pada pendidikan, rehabilitasi, dan keterlibatan orang tua/wali dalam proses pembinaan anak pelaku kejahatan.
Problematika Pemberlakuan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 sebagai Rujukan Dasar Pelaku Pencurian Tandan Buah Segar di Lingkungan Perseroan Terbatas Perkebunan Nusantara IV Regional II Muhammad Reza Triangga Triangga; Ismaidar; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 09 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i09.2260

Abstract

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (Perma) Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 dikeluarkan untuk menyesuaikan ambang batas kerugian dalam kasus pidana ringan, termasuk pencurian kecil, untuk mengurangi beban sistem peradilan pidana. Namun, penerapannya sebagai dasar hukum untuk kasus pencurian Tandan Buah Segar (FFB) di perkebunan kelapa sawit menimbulkan masalah hukum dan sosial. Di satu sisi, nilai ekonomi FFB yang dicuri seringkali di bawah ambang batas yang ditetapkan oleh Perma, sehingga pelaku hanya menerima sanksi ringan. Di sisi lain, tindakan tersebut secara sistematis, berulang, dan terorganisir menyebabkan kerugian bagi perusahaan dan berdampak pada stabilitas sosial di daerah sekitar perkebunan. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris untuk menguji relevansi, efektivitas, dan dampak penggunaan Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyesuaian Batas Denda untuk Tindak Pidana Ringan di HUKP (Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan), khususnya dalam menangani kasus pencurian FFB. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ketidakseimbangan antara pendekatan formal berdasarkan nilai kerugian dan kerugian substantif yang dialami oleh perusahaan. Hal ini menciptakan ketidakseimbangan yang problematis antara penegakan hukum yang adil dan perlindungan kepentingan industri strategis. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan kebijakan hukum yang lebih kontekstual yang mempertimbangkan karakteristik lokal dan nilai kumulatif dari tindakan kriminal berulang dalam kasus serupa.
Co-Authors Abdi Ridho Ari Antonius Sibarani Aulia Rahman Hakim Hasibuan Bambang Harianto Dio Dera Darmawan Erwin Juliandi Sipakkar Farlin Subeki Fauzan Freddi Agus Hutapea Haykal Ramadhan Adrianto Hempi Wanty Saragih Henry Aspan Imam Saputra Ismaidar I, Ismaidar Ismaidar Ismaidar Kevin Maisyan Rizaldi Mendrofa Muhammad Reza Triangga Triangga Musannif Nadia Novitri Hasibuan Redyanto Sidi Rio Aginta Ginting Suci Ramadani Syahranuddin