Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) JURNAL KELUARGA SEHAT SEJAHTERA International Journal of Society and Law
ABDUL RAHMAN MAULANA SIREGAR
Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS NORMATIF PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA MEDIS DALAM PROGRAM PENDIDIKAN DOKTER SPESIALIS BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG KESEHATAN Farlin Subeki; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
JURNAL KELUARGA SEHAT SEJAHTERA Vol 22, No 1 (2024): JURNAL KELUARGA SEHAT SEJAHTERA
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/jkss.v22i1.62338

Abstract

Pertanggungjawaban peserta Pendidikan dokter spesialis dalam pelayanan Kesehatan menimbulkan kompleksitas dalam Undang-undang Kesehatan. Meskipun mendukung pendidikan medis memunculkan ketidakjelasan dalam tanggungjawab hukum, pengawasan praktik medis dan penyelesaian sengketa termasuk melalui majelis disiplin profesi. Digunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis data dari bahan hukum seperti konsep, teori, doktrin dan pendapat ahli. Dalam sistem penyelesaian sengketa medis, Undang-undang Kesehatan menimbulkan kompleksitas karena ketentuan mengenai kerjasama rumah sakit pendidikan dan perguruan tinggi dalam pendidikan medis serta tanggungjawab peserta didik dalam praktik medis berpotensi membingungkan dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa. Seperti kasus Siska Makatey menunjukkan pentingnya pengawasan ketat untuk mencegah malpraktik oleh peserta didik diluar kompetensinya
Legal Certainty in the Legislative System in Indonesia study on the Information and Electronic Transactions Law Hempi Wanty Saragih; Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
International Journal of Society and Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Yayasan Multidimensi Kreatif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal certainty is a fundamental element in the legal system that aims to create justice, order, and predictability in society. However, in practice, the existence of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) often causes polemics due to multiple interpretations and inconsistent application. This study aims to examine the aspects of legal certainty in the ITE Law by highlighting articles that are in the public spotlight, such as related to insult and defamation, as well as their technical implementation in the field. The research method used is juridical-normative with an analytical approach to the text of the law and juridical-empirical through case studies and interviews with legal practitioners. The results of the study show that legal uncertainty in the ITE Law is caused by the lack of harmonization between the ITE Law and other laws, weak public understanding of regulations, and uneven implementation by law enforcement officials. To create better legal certainty, revisions to articles with multiple interpretations, capacity building for law enforcement officials, and comprehensive public education about the ITE Law are needed. This research is expected to make a theoretical contribution to the development of legal studies in Indonesia as well as a basis for recommendations for policymakers in improving the quality of legislation.
The Uniqueness of Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution Method Outside the Court in Resolving Various Customary Disputes in Simalungun Regency Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.5004

Abstract

Mediation as an alternative dispute resolution outside the court has its own uniqueness in resolving various customary disputes. Generally, when a dispute arises between parties, the community tends to be more familiar with resolving disputes through customary means, or what they refer to as mediation. Mediation is a term commonly used by the community when disputes occur. Thus, mediation as an alternative dispute resolution holds a unique position among the people, particularly in Simalungun Regency, in resolving various customary disputes without the involvement of the courts. This article will further discuss the uniqueness of mediation in resolving customary disputes, the advantages and disadvantages of applying mediation as an alternative dispute resolution outside the court in Simalungun Regency. The importance of establishing mediation as an effective method for alternative dispute resolution outside the court for various customary disputes lies in its easy procedures, active involvement of the disputing parties, and respect for customary values and norms in maintaining social harmony and prioritizing win-win solutions. Moreover, mediation not only provides a practical and efficient solution but also helps to strengthen social relationships and preserve local cultural continuity. Therefore, mediation is considered a suitable and beneficial means for resolving customary disputes, offering a more familial approach compared to court resolution processes.
RECONSTRUCTION OF LEGAL FINDINGS AND REASONING ON ACEH'S LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY WITHIN THE FRAME WORK OF SPECIAL AUTONOMY Abdul Rahman Maulana Siregar; Musannif
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4885

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the process of legal discovery and reasoning by the Aceh People's Representative Council (DPRA) in drafting qanuns, the extent to which these qanuns are in accordance with national laws and general legal principles, and the legal and social obstacles that arise in their implementation. The study uses a qualitative, normative-empirical method, with a literature study approach, semi-structured interviews with DPRA members, legal academics, and community leaders, and observations of the implementation of qanuns in the field. The results show that the Aceh DPRA applies legal reasoning to interpret national legal norms and adapt them to the local Acehnese context, and uses legal discovery to fill gaps or overlapping regulations. Although most qanuns are in line with the Aceh Special Autonomy Law and general legal principles, there are several qanuns that create potential legal conflicts with national regulations. Obstacles to qanun implementation include inconsistencies in norms, limited apparatus capacity, the complexity of qanuns for the community, and the lack of effective oversight mechanisms. The strategy of reconstructing legal discovery and reasoning through the integration of normative studies, empirical evaluation, and multi-stakeholder participation has been proven to be able to improve the quality of Aceh's legislation, ensuring that qanuns are more relevant, effective, and have legal and social legitimacy.
Co-Authors Farlin Subeki Hempi Wanty Saragih Musannif