Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NUKHBATUL 'ULUM : Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam
Kurnaemi Anita
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab Makassar, Indonesia
Religion

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Forced Divorce Polemic: Comparative Analysis of the Hanafi and Shafii Schools of Thought Muhammad Nirwan Idris; Kurnaemi Anita
NUKHBATUL 'ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam Vol 10 No 1 (2024): NUKHBATUL 'ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/nukhbah.v10i1.1073

Abstract

This article aims to summarize the views of the Hanafi and Shafii madhhabs regarding the status of divorce of a person who is forced and the method of determining it, as well as to find out the method of scholars in tarjīḥ opinion between the Hanafi and Shafii schools in this case. To get answers to the problems, this article uses library research that focuses on manuscript and text studies, using case and comparative approach methods. By looking at some coercive ḍawābiṭ, the results of the study found that; First, the Hanafis argue that divorce imposed by a person who is forced is legal, because here he faces two tough choices, namely divorcing his wife or receiving threats from the person who forced him, and in fact, he chooses to divorce his wife. In contrast to the Shafii school of thought, which is not consider valid, because divorce is an absolute right for the husband alone, also because Allah has aborted disbelief in those who are forced to disbelieve. The istinbāṭ method of the law used by the Hanafi and Shafii schools is that they both use kias. Second, the scholar's method in tarjīḥ the opinion between the Hanafi school and the Shafii school regarding forced divorce is by looking at the sanad hadith. In this case, the majority of scholars further strengthen the hadiths used as evidence by the Shafii school because they see the ṡīqāh (trusted) narrators of hadith so that all of their narrators can be used as evidence.
Co-Authors Muhammad Nirwan Idris