Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal WAHATUL MUJTAMA: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab
Irsyad Rafi
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Peran Majelis Taklim al-Hidayah sebagai Penyelenggara Kegiatan Keagamaan untuk Warga Negara Indonesia di Kota Riyadh Irsyad Rafi; Anugrah Anugrah
WAHATUL MUJTAMA': Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 5 No 1 (2024): WAHATUL MUJTAMA': Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/wahatul.v5i1.1427

Abstract

This Community Service Program (PkM) aims to increase the religious understanding of Indonesian citizens in the city of Riyadh through the role of the Al-Hidayah Taklim Council. The PkM method used is the implementation of Al-Hidayah taklim assemblies, such as al-Qur'an halaqah with two main activities, namely tahsin and tahfiz, Arabic halaqah, scientific studies, including fiqh, aqidah, Al-Qur'an sciences. and studies with special themes according to certain moments. This activity program is carried out regularly on Fridays and Saturdays flexibly. The result of this PkM is that apart from being a place of learning that is able to increase religious knowledge for Indonesian citizens, the taklim assembly also acts as a forum that strengthens and strengthens friendship and social relations between Indonesian citizens, instilling the values ​​of solidarity and brotherhood, as well as moral and spiritual values. The taklim assembly also has an important role in assisting the Embassy of the Republic of Indonesia (KBRI) in providing protection and shelter for Indonesian citizens in the city of Riyadh. The taklim assembly as a social and educational institution plays an active role in collaborating with the Indonesian Embassy in ensuring the welfare and needs of Indonesian citizens, especially in religious aspects. The existence of the Al-Hidayah Taklim Council and its role has had a positive impact on Indonesian citizens in the city of Riyadh.
Analisis Ijtihad ʻAbdullah Bin ʻAbbās pada Masalah ‘Aul dan Radd dalam Fikih Mawārīṡ Suleha Suleha; Rahmat Rahmat; Irsyad Rafi
AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab Vol 3 No 4 (2024): AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/qiblah.v3i4.1645

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the ijtihad (jurisprudential reasoning) of ʻAbdullah bin ʻAbbās regarding the issues of ‘Aul and Radd within the context of Islamic inheritance law (fikih mawāriṡ). This study employs a literature review method (library research) with a normative juridical approach, seeking legal sources through evidence from the Qur’an, the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad (hadith), and the opinions of scholars. The findings of the research indicate that the concept of ‘Aul serves as a mechanism to adjust inheritance portions when the total specified in the Qur’anic verses exceeds the actual available estate. On the other hand, the concept of Radd involves distributing the surplus of the estate to specific heirs after the primary distribution. ʻAbdullah bin ʻAbbās's ijtihad rejects the application of ‘Aul, arguing that adjusting inheritance portions is unnecessary based on his interpretation of Qur’anic verses. Regarding Radd, he opines that the surplus should not be given to spouses and grandmothers due to kinship reasons. His stance against ‘Aul does not guarantee fairness in inheritance distribution, a fundamental principle in Islamic law, unlike Radd which ensures a fair distribution and upholds the rights of specified heirs as prescribed by Shariah. Excluding grandmothers from receiving Radd inheritance is seen as inadequate in considering the principles of justice and balance in Islamic inheritance law, as grandmothers are among the heirs of aṣḥāb al-furūḍ through familial ties, distinct from spouses who inherit through marital relations. This research aims to contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of Islamic inheritance law (Fikih Mawārīṡ) and serve as a reference for future studies.
Tinjauan Fikih Jinayah Terhadap Konsekuensi Zina dalam KUHP Tahun 1946 dan No. 01 Tahun 2023 Aditya Renaldi Yasdin; Rapung Rapung; Irsyad Rafi
AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab Vol 3 No 4 (2024): AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/qiblah.v3i4.1655

Abstract

This research aims to understand the Islamic perspective and the laws related to the definition of adultery, as well as a review of jinayah jurisprudence on the consequences of adultery in the Criminal Code of 1946 and No. 01 of 2023. This research is qualitative with a normative juridical approach, using library research methods by collecting books or references related to the research. The results show that, first, adultery in the perspective of jinayah jurisprudence has a different definition from Article 284 of the 1946 Criminal Code, which considers adultery as intercourse committed only by those who are married. Meanwhile, adultery according to Article 411 of the 2023 Criminal Code has the same meaning as the perspective of jinayah jurisprudence, which is intercourse committed by those who are either married or unmarried. Second, the review of jinayah jurisprudence on the consequences of adultery in the 1946 Criminal Code and No. 01 of 2023 is not accepted, because the imposition of sanctions for the crime of adultery must consider stronger evidence. Jinayah jurisprudence differentiates the consequences of adultery into two: stoning for those who are married, and one hundred lashes and one year of exile for those who are not married. The 1946 Criminal Code punishes perpetrators of adultery with a maximum prison sentence of 9 months for those who are married. Meanwhile, Article 411 does not differentiate the marital status of the perpetrator and punishes with a maximum prison sentence of 1 year or a fine of up to 10 million rupiahs. In the case of cohabitation, the penalty is a maximum of 6 months in prison or a fine of up to 10 million rupiahs. If adultery is committed with a family member, the prison sentence can reach 10 years. This research provides insights for students and the public about the limits and legal consequences of adultery from the perspective of jinayah jurisprudence and the Criminal Code.
Co-Authors Aditya Renaldi Yasdin Anugrah Anugrah Rahmat Rahmat Rapung Rapung Suleha Suleha