Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Roli Pebrianto
Universitas Samawa
Arts Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Reformulasi Sanksi Pidana bagi Pelaku Eutanasia dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Roli Pebrianto
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/kihan.v1i2.1925

Abstract

Purpose: To find out about eutanasia from the perspective of legal protection and human rights; as well as criminal law policies related to sanctions for eutanasia perpetrators in Indonesia. Research Methodology: The method used in this research is normative legal research, while the approach used is a statute approach, namely the Indonesian Criminal Code. Results: Prison sentence arrangements for doctors who practice active eutanasia need to be considered and studied further which must accommodate many things including the doctor's obligation to cure patients on the one hand, while on the other hand there is the patient's right to end his life because his illness is unlikely to be cured. Limitations: This research is limited to normative legal research that uses only primary legal materials, namely a comparison of the application of the eutanasia article in the old and new Criminal Codes, as well as threats of sanctions that are felt to have not fulfilled the value of justice. Contribution: In criminal law policies, it is necessary to consider alternative punishments other than imprisonment, for example fines. In this case, it is not necessary to remove the threat of imprisonment in Article 461 of the new Criminal Code, but to add a new article or paragraph which accommodates other forms of sanctions as an alternative to imprisonment. So that imprisonment will be imposed selectively, limitedly, and casuistically.
Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Tentang Pemeriksaan Prajurit TNI yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Umum Roli Pebrianto
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Februari 2024
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v3i1.1194

Abstract

Dalam KUHAP dan UU Peradilan Militer tidak terdapat ketentuan mengenai penyerahan anggota TNI yang melakukan tindak pidana biasa untuk diperiksa dan diadili di Pengadilan Negeri. Namun yang diatur dalam KUHAP adalah soal konektivitas. Perspektif pemutakhiran KUHAP Militer Indonesia mengenai kebijakan hukum pidana pemeriksaan anggota TNI yang melakukan tindak pidana biasa menunjukkan bahwa penyidik ​​di lingkungan peradilan sipil tidak dapat sepenuhnya menjalankan kewenangannya dengan kondisi saat ini. Masih diperlukannya kerangka hukum yang jelas untuk memandu pelaksanaannya, sehingga memerlukan kebijakan lebih lanjut dari pembuat undang-undang. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi bagi pengembangan ilmu hukum pidana dalam rangka reformasi hukum acara pidana militer, khususnya mengenai mekanisme pemeriksaan anggota militer Indonesia yang melakukan kejahatan biasa. Hal ini diperlukan untuk mengimbangi lanskap hukum yang berkembang pesat, apalagi mengingat Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) telah diperbarui. Oleh karena itu, sangatlah penting untuk mereformasi hukum pidana militer di Indonesia.
Kekuatan Pembuktian Tanpa Hadirnya Korban Di Persidangan Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan : Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sumbawa Besar Nomor: 142/Pid.B/2023/PN.Sbw Roli Pebrianto
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): May : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i3.231

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of witness testimony in the criminal justice process in Indonesia, particularly in cases of violent theft. This research focuses on the decision of the Sumbawa Besar District Court Number: 142/Pid.B/2023/PN.Sbw. The method used is normative legal research, which analyzes primary and secondary legal documents to understand how testimony is used in court despite the absence of the victim. This study finds that witness testimony is crucial in proving criminal acts. However, in this case, most of the testimony provided was testimonium de auditu, based on hearing from others rather than direct experience. This raises issues concerning the validity of such testimony as legitimate evidence. The conclusion of this research indicates that although witness testimony is important, caution must be exercised in assessing its validity, especially when the testimony does not originate from the direct experience of the witness. This is important to ensure a fair trial process in accordance with applicable legal principles.
Co-Authors