Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mitra Sains
Muh. Rizal
Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Pascasarjana Universitas Tadulako
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Profil Berpikir Kritis Siswa Smp Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Elfa Puspita; Sukayasa Sukayasa; Muh. Rizal
Mitra Sains Vol 5 No 4 (2017): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/mitrasains.v5i4.97

Abstract

The objective of this qualitative research is to find out the description of the critical thinking profile of SMP students in solving mathematic problems in terms of cognitive style. To achieve the objective of this research used Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) by dividing students into field dependent and field independent cognitive style, mathematic problem, interview and observation. The result of this research shows that: (1) understanding the problem, SAi and SMd are able to identify, collect and analyse the given facts and information clearly and logicaly, (2) make a plan, SAi dan SMd are able to devine the alternative solution in order to solve the problem (3) carrying out the problem, SAi is able to use the alternative problem solution based on his plan systematically; meanwhile, SMd still finds it difficult to use the alternative problem solution based on his implementation plan not systematically. and (4) in the last step, SAi is able to evaluate the obtained result relevantly. Furthermore, he also can give clear argument in testing the obtained result. Whereas, SMd is not able to evaluate the obtained result relevantly, so he can not the given in testing the obtained result.
Profil Pemecahan Masalah Persamaan Linear Satu Variabel Siswa Climber Pada Kelas Vii Smp Negeri 3 Palu Padliani Padliani; Sudarman Bennu; Muh. Rizal
Mitra Sains Vol 5 No 4 (2017): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/mitrasains.v5i4.100

Abstract

This research aimed to describe the profil of students’ problem solving of one variable linear equations of the climber students’ in the grade VII of SMP Negeri 3 Palu. The research subject was gained by adversity response profile questionnaire to classify the type of student that type of adversity quotient climber, camper, and a quitter. Subjects used in this research only one student type of climber. The results of this research shows that: (1) understand the problem, students climber unyielding so as to identify and propose things that are known and questioned on the issue, (2) make a plan, students climber motivate yourself and not easily satisfied so as to propose a contingency plan that will be done to solve the problem, (3) carrying out the plan, students climber always trying and not give up so as to implement the plan as planned and the results obtained are correct, and (4) looking back, students climber is not so just believe in the truth of the results obtained, so the retest by linking it known denfan results.
Profil Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Elfa Puspita; Sukayasa Sukayasa; Muh. Rizal
Mitra Sains Vol 7 No 3 (2019): September
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/mitrasains.v7i3.234

Abstract

The objective of this qualitative research is to find out the description of the critical thinking profile of SMP students in solving mathematic problems in terms of cognitive style. To achieve the objective of this research used Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) by dividing students into field dependent and field independent cognitive style, mathematic problem, interview and observation. The result of this research shows that: (1) understanding the problem, SAi and SMd are able to identify, collect and analyse the given facts and information clearly and logicaly, (2) make a plan, SAi dan SMd are able to devine the alternative solution in order to solve the problem (3) carrying out the problem, SAi is able to use the alternative problem solution based on his plan systematically; meanwhile, SMd still finds it difficult to use the alternative problem solution based on his implementation plan not systematically. and (4) in the last step, SAi is able to evaluate the obtained result relevantly. Furthermore, he also can give clear argument in testing the obtained result. Whereas, SMd is not able to evaluate the obtained result relevantly, so he can not the given in testing the obtained result.
Co-Authors Elfa Puspita Padliani Padliani Sudarman Bennu Sukayasa Sukayasa