This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mitra Sains
Baso Amri
Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Sains Pascasarjana Universitas Tadulako

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Dan Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Palu Rosdiana Rosdiana; Maxinus Djaeng; Baso Amri
Mitra Sains Vol 3 No 4 (2015): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/mitrasains.v3i4.120

Abstract

This study aims to explain the influence of models of inquiry learning and cognitive styles of students towards mathematics student learning achievements. This study is a quasi-experimental design with factorial 2 × 2. The independent variable in this study is the inquiry learning and direct instruction. Cognitive styles of students is divided into two parts, namely the cognitive style field independent (FI) and cognitive style field dependent (FD). The dependent variable is the result of students' mathematics learning. The instrument used was GEFT test used to determine students' prior learning styles koognitif implemented and achievement test used to measure the learning achievements of students after learning mathematics implemented. Samples were students of class VIII SMP Palu Negeri 2 theconsist of 48 students were taken by purposive sampling technique. Data were analyzed using ANOVA analysis of two-path. The results showed that (1) there is an interaction between the model and style koognitif inquiry learning on learning achievement outcomes of mathematics, (2) there is a difference between students' mathematics learning achievements by inquiry learning model and the learning achievements of students who received direct instruction on a group of students who have FI force, (3) there are differences in mathematics learning achievements of students who received the inquiry learning model and who received students learning directly to the student groups which share FD cognitive styles, (4) there are differences in mathematics learning outcomes of students between who have cognitive styles FI and students who have the cognitive styles of students who obtain the FD on inquiry learning, (5) there are differences in mathematics learning achievements students’, among students who have cognitive styles FI with students who have the cognitive style FD on students who received direct instruction.
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Di Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 2 Palu Aziza Aziza; Maxinus Djaeng; Baso Amri
Mitra Sains Vol 4 No 3 (2016): Juli
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22487/mitrasains.v4i3.243

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the effect of learning model and learning motivation on studets’ learning achievements in mathematics. This research was conducted at SMAN 2 Palu using a quasi-experimental design with factorial 2 ´ 2. The independent variable in this study is learning model and learning motivation. The dependent variable is the students' mathematics learning achievements. Instruments used in the form of learning motivation questionnaire and achievement test. These samples students of class XI-IPA taken using random sampling techniques. Analysis of data using analysis of variance two-lane. Results showed (1) there is a significant difference the mathematics learning achievements of students between who are taught trough active learning model and direct learning; (2) there is a significant difference the mathematics learning achievements of students beetween high learning motivation and student learning achievements learning motivation is low; (3) there is an interaction between learning active learning model and learning motivation of students; (4) specifically for low motivation students who are taught by active learning model mathematics learning achievements was higher than students taught with direct learning; (5) specifically for high motivation students who are taught by active learning model mathematics learning achievements was lower than students taught with direct learning; (6) specifically for active learning model students who have high motivation to mathematics learning achievements higher than the students who have low motivation, and (7) specifically for direct learning model students who have high motivation to mathematics learning achievements higher than the students who have low motivation.