Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.778
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
Muhamad - Abas
Faculty of Law, Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Juridical Analysis of the Element of Bad Faith in the Brand Rights Ownership Dispute Between Ruben Samuel Onsu and PT. Benny Sujono's Geprek Chicken Based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications (Study of Supreme Court Deci Rommy - Herfianto; Yuniar - Rahmatiar; Muhamad - Abas
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.4387

Abstract

Merek berfungsi bukan hanya sebagai identitas tetapi merek juga secara ekonomi memiliki nilai, sehingga banyak dilakukan upaya pendaftaran merek dengan iktikad tidak baik. Salah satu sengketa hak merek dagang yang pernah terjadi di Indonesia adalah perebutan nama merek “Bensu” antara “Geprek Bensu” milik Ruben Samuel Onsu dengan “I Am Geprek Bensu” miliki PT. Ayam Geprek Benny Sujono. Penyelesaian sengketa terhadap hak merek dagang “Geprek Bensu” dengan “I Am Geprek Bensu” di Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 57/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2019. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana pertanggungjawaban hukum dari pelanggaran unsur iktikad tidak baik berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 57/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2019 atas pelanggaran unsur iktikad tidak baik pada permohonan merek “Geprek Bensu”. Metode penilitian yuridis normatif, dilakukan dengan melihat peraturan perundang-undangan diterapkan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, bahwa pertanggungjawaban hukum terhadap pelanggaran unsur iktikad tidak baik menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis berpedoman kepada ketentuan Pasal 21 UU Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, yaitu dengan cara: (a) Penolakan merek sejak proses pendaftaran; (b) Penghapusan merek oleh pemilik merek, pemerintah (menteri) atau pihak ketiga; (c) Pembatalan merek dengan cara gugatan ke Pengadilan Niaga. Pertimbangan hakim Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 57/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2019 telah sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip perlindungan Hak Merek di Indonesia. Putusan pengadilan menganggap bahwa Ruben Samuel Onsu sebagai pendaftar hak cipta merek dagangnya memiliki iktikad yang kurang baik karena “Geprek Bensu” memiliki kesamaan mulai dari produk sajian yang dijual, warna logo, dan gambar ayam di logo dengan merek “I Am Geprek Bensu” milik PT. Ayam Geprek Benny Sujono.
Various factors such as social conditions, revenge, greed, and psychological problems can encourage a person to commit a criminal act, including premeditated murder regulated in Article 340 of the Indonesian Criminal Code. This qualitative research with a Jetro - Manurung; Muhammad - Gagarin Akbar; Muhamad - Abas
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.4932

Abstract

Various factors such as social conditions, revenge, greed, and psychological problems can encourage a person to commit a criminal act, including premeditated murder regulated in Article 340 of the Indonesian Criminal Code. This qualitative research with a normative fiqh approach examines the causative factors, their relation to the theory of moral development, and the handling of the perpetrators. The results show that the motivation for premeditated murder is still at the preconventional stage of moral development, including punishment orientation and self-interest. Comprehensive handling efforts include early prevention, legal assistance, strengthening the justice system, inter-agency cooperation, rehabilitation, supervision of ex-convicts, victim protection, psychological counseling, international cooperation, law enforcement, and increasing public awareness, with the aim of preventing, handling, and rehabilitating perpetrators and protecting the public.
Restorative Justice Paradigm Shift based on Perma No. 1 of 2024 to Realize Victim Recovery and Criminal Accountability Siva Rizkia Adimu; Deny - Guntara; Muhamad - Abas
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.4933

Abstract

Restorative Justice is considered an appropriate formulation to take into account the circumstances of victims of criminal acts which in the criminal justice system are usually considered to be only oriented towards criminalizing the perpetrators of the crime. The problem in this article focuses on the restorative provisions in Perma No.1/2024 concerning guidelines for trying criminal cases according to restorative justice, and the shift in the paradigm of restorative justice in Indonesia. The method in the following research is to use normative legal research, by analyzing the provisions related to restorative justice. The results of the research and discussion explain that the idea of restorative justice in Perma No.1/2024 explains that restorative justice is carried out with the intention of restoring victims and does not aim to eliminate criminal responsibility carried out in the form of a judge's or court decision. The next research result is the shift in the paradigm of restorative justice in Indonesia, which was originally through Police Regulation No. 8/2021 concerning Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice and Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2021 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice, restorative justice is considered a mechanism for terminating cases, which according to the author can cause problems for both victims and for the interests of the law itself, so the implementation of restorative justice should be in accordance with Perma Number 1 of 2024 which has shifted its paradigm not only as a victim's recovery by not eliminating criminal liability through a decision, not terminating the case.
Co-Authors Deny - Guntara Jetro - Manurung Muhammad - Gagarin Akbar Rommy - Herfianto Siva Rizkia Adimu Yuniar - Rahmatiar