Ida Bagus Budhi Surya Adnyana
Department Of Digestive Surgery, Faculty Of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret/Dr. Moewardi General Hospital, Surakarta, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Periosteal Stripping Induces Comparable Early Callus Formation but Late-Phase Regression: A Histomorphometric and Machine-Learning Analysis in a Rat Femoral Fracture Model Chandra Budi Hartono; Udi Herunefi Hancoro; Ida Bagus Budhi Surya Adnyana
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 4 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i4.1567

Abstract

Background: The periosteum is critical for fracture healing, serving as a reservoir for osteoprogenitor cells and vascular supply. A clinical paradox exists where periosteal stripping is considered detrimental yet is historically associated with hypertrophic overgrowth. This study investigates the temporal paradox of periosteal stripping, testing the hypothesis that it induces a biphasic response characterized by early inflammatory compensation followed by late-phase regenerative failure. Methods: Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into four groups (n=6/group): Intact Periosteum (PI) and Periosteal Stripping (PS), evaluated at 14 and 28 days post-fracture. Mid-diaphyseal femoral fractures were stabilized with 1.0 mm K-wires. Healing was quantified using a validated Modified Allen-Huo Histological Score (0-10) and Trainable Weka Segmentation (TWS) for tissue classification. Osteoclast activity was assessed via Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) staining. Results: At Day 14, the PS group exhibited healing comparable to the PI group (Median Score: 8.0 [IQR 8.0–9.0] vs. 8.0 [IQR 7.0–8.0]; p = 0.176), driven by hypertrophic soft callus formation rather than true osteogenesis. However, by Day 28, the PS group demonstrated significant regression (Median Score: 3.5 [IQR 3.0–4.8]) compared to the PI group (Median Score: 8.0 [IQR 8.0–8.0]; p = 0.006). Quantitative histomorphometry revealed significantly higher osteoclast density in the PS-28 group (TRAP+ cells: 18.5 ± 2.1/field) compared to PI-28 (4.2 ± 1.1/field; p < 0.001), indicating active resorption of the unstable callus. Conclusion: Periosteal stripping does not accelerate early healing but induces a volume-matched inflammatory callus that fails to consolidate. The significant late-phase regression underscores the vital role of the cambium layer in definitive remodeling. Surgical preservation of the periosteum is mandated to prevent atrophic non-union.
Temporal Dynamics of Postoperative Enterocolitis in Hirschsprung Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Earlier Onset After TAERPT versus the Duhamel Procedure Anisa Ika Pratiwi; Nunik Agustriani; Suwardi; Ida Bagus Budhi Surya Adnyana; Henky Agung Nugroho
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i1.1478

Abstract

Background: Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) remains the most formidable cause of morbidity in surgically corrected Hirschsprung disease (HD). While the transanal endorectal pull-through (TAERPT) and the Duhamel procedure are standard treatments, a critical knowledge gap exists regarding the timing of postoperative HAEC onset associated with each technique. This study aimed to investigate and compare the temporal dynamics of HAEC presentation following these distinct surgical reconstructions. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study reviewed 64 HD patients who underwent either TAERPT (n=32) or a modified Duhamel procedure (n=32) between January 2022 and January 2023 at a tertiary referral hospital. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe HAEC (HAEC score ≥10). The principal secondary outcome was the time to onset of the first episode of mild-to-moderate HAEC (score <10). Due to the non-normal distribution of onset data, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical comparison. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the two cohorts. The incidence of severe HAEC was 0% in both the TAERPT and Duhamel groups. All recorded complications were mild-to-moderate and managed non-surgically. A statistically significant and clinically profound difference in the timing of these complications was observed. The median onset of HAEC in the TAERPT group was 6.0 months (Interquartile Range [IQR], 3.0-6.0), which was significantly earlier than the median onset of 8.5 months (IQR, 3.0-24.0) in the Duhamel group (p < 0.001). The mean onset times were 5.50 ± 1.90 months and 16.09 ± 16.33 months, respectively. Conclusion: Although both TAERPT and the Duhamel procedure demonstrated excellent safety profiles regarding severe HAEC, their associated temporal patterns of mild-to-moderate enterocolitis are markedly different. The significantly earlier onset of complications following TAERPT suggests that postoperative surveillance strategies should be procedure-specific, with intensified clinical vigilance during the first postoperative year for TAERPT patients.
Periosteal Stripping Induces Comparable Early Callus Formation but Late-Phase Regression: A Histomorphometric and Machine-Learning Analysis in a Rat Femoral Fracture Model Chandra Budi Hartono; Udi Herunefi Hancoro; Ida Bagus Budhi Surya Adnyana
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 10 No. 4 (2026): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v10i4.1567

Abstract

Background: The periosteum is critical for fracture healing, serving as a reservoir for osteoprogenitor cells and vascular supply. A clinical paradox exists where periosteal stripping is considered detrimental yet is historically associated with hypertrophic overgrowth. This study investigates the temporal paradox of periosteal stripping, testing the hypothesis that it induces a biphasic response characterized by early inflammatory compensation followed by late-phase regenerative failure. Methods: Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into four groups (n=6/group): Intact Periosteum (PI) and Periosteal Stripping (PS), evaluated at 14 and 28 days post-fracture. Mid-diaphyseal femoral fractures were stabilized with 1.0 mm K-wires. Healing was quantified using a validated Modified Allen-Huo Histological Score (0-10) and Trainable Weka Segmentation (TWS) for tissue classification. Osteoclast activity was assessed via Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) staining. Results: At Day 14, the PS group exhibited healing comparable to the PI group (Median Score: 8.0 [IQR 8.0–9.0] vs. 8.0 [IQR 7.0–8.0]; p = 0.176), driven by hypertrophic soft callus formation rather than true osteogenesis. However, by Day 28, the PS group demonstrated significant regression (Median Score: 3.5 [IQR 3.0–4.8]) compared to the PI group (Median Score: 8.0 [IQR 8.0–8.0]; p = 0.006). Quantitative histomorphometry revealed significantly higher osteoclast density in the PS-28 group (TRAP+ cells: 18.5 ± 2.1/field) compared to PI-28 (4.2 ± 1.1/field; p < 0.001), indicating active resorption of the unstable callus. Conclusion: Periosteal stripping does not accelerate early healing but induces a volume-matched inflammatory callus that fails to consolidate. The significant late-phase regression underscores the vital role of the cambium layer in definitive remodeling. Surgical preservation of the periosteum is mandated to prevent atrophic non-union.