Yohanes Twintarto Agus Indratno
STT Anugrah Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Menjawab Tuduhan Comma Johanneum 1 Yohanes 5:7-8 Sebagai Ayat Palsu Melalui Tulisan Bapa-Bapa Gereja Didit Yuliantono Adi; Yohanes Twintarto Agus Indratno
Philoxenia: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristiani Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Philoxenia: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristiani
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Kalvary - Maluku Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59386/7nndas83

Abstract

The idea for writing this scientific work came from the author's ministry experience, which often encountered questions about the inerrancy of the Bible, especially regarding the authenticity of 1 John 5:7-8 or the Comma Johanneum. The purpose of writing this scientific work is to find evidence that 1 John 5:7-8 is the Word of God revealed to the apostle John. The method used in this writing is a qualitative method with a literature study approach. From this research, evidence was found that, although the Comma Johanneum is not found in ancient Greek texts, this verse can be traced to an ancient Latin document called the Vetus Latina and from the writings of the church fathers, namely Tertullian, Ciprian, Athanasius, Origen, Augustine , Pricilian, Jerome, Gregory Nazianus and Johanes Chrisostomos whose writings still exist and have been preserved to this day. Thus the accusation that this verse is fake or a hoax has been successfully refuted.
SALVATION WITHOUT RESURRECTION? A SOTERIOLOGICAL-ESCHATOLOGICAL CRITIQUE OF TRANSHUMANISM, MIND UPLOADING, AND THE PROMISE OF DIGITAL IMMORTALITY Benediktus James Widya Darmaka; Yohanes Twintarto Agus Indratno; Andreas Andry Handiyanto
Diegesis : Jurnal Teologi Vol 11 No 2 (2026): DIEGESIS: JURNAL TEOLOGI
Publisher : STT Bethel Indonesia Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46933/DGS.vol11i2%p

Abstract

Transhumanism increasingly relocates the human longing for salvation from the religious sphere into technological projects. Among its most radical proposals is mind uploading: the claim that human mental structures, memories, personality, or consciousness could be transferred to, or reconstructed on, a non-biological substrate, allowing some form of existence to continue beyond biological death. This article subjects the promise of digital immortality to a Christian soteriological-eschatological critique. Using a constructive-systematic theological approach, it combines literature review, conceptual analysis, and critical engagement with recent scholarship on transhumanism, personal identity, artificial intelligence, and Christian eschatology. It argues that mind uploading cannot be identified with salvation or resurrection because informational persistence is not the same as personal continuity, disembodiment is incompatible with a resurrection-centered anthropology, and Christian salvation is not achieved through technological preservation but through God's action in Christ. The article's contribution lies in formulating “resurrective-continuity criteria” comprising four interrelated elements: divine agency, embodied personal continuity, Christological participation, and cosmic renewal. These criteria show that technology may extend, represent, or simulate life, but it cannot produce the eschatological mode of life that Christian faith names resurrection. The decisive problem raised by transhumanism, therefore, is not merely the limit of technological capability. It is the redefinition of salvation itself: from gift to engineering, from resurrection to informational replication, and from new creation to the persistence of a system.