Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Utang Rosidin
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Judicial Review terhadap Sistem Hukum di Indonesia Rafli Akbar Rabbani; Riva Nurkania; Soraya Salimah; Utang Rosidin
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1747

Abstract

The Constitutional Court (CC) was established following the amendments to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and holds a strategic role in upholding constitutional supremacy through its authority of judicial review. Although CC decisions are final and binding, their implementation often encounters political resistance, legislative delays, and weak institutional commitment, which may undermine legal certainty and constitutional governance. This study employs a normative juridical method using a statutory approach and library research, focusing on selected Constitutional Court decisions and their follow-up mechanisms. The findings show that the effectiveness of CC rulings is not solely determined by their juridical force, but largely depends on the responsiveness and synergy of legislative and executive institutions. Inconsistent implementation of CC decisions has led to regulatory gaps and uncertainty within the legal system. Therefore, strengthening institutional commitment and harmonizing judicial and legislative functions are essential to reinforce legal certainty, justice, and constitutional democracy in Indonesia.
Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Hak atas Lingkungan Hidup yang Baik dalam Kasus Pencemaran Lintas Batas: Telaah terhadap Prinsip Kedaulatan Negara Rena Zulfaidah; Utang Rosidin
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1748

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional review of the right to a good and healthy environment as guaranteed under Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia in the context of transboundary environmental pollution, with a focus on the interpretation of state sovereignty. Transboundary pollution raises serious legal challenges due to the limitations of national jurisdiction in protecting citizens’ constitutional rights from environmental harm originating outside state territory. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches by analyzing the 1945 Constitution, environmental legislation, and relevant Constitutional Court decisions. The findings indicate that a narrow and territorial interpretation of state sovereignty may undermine the effective protection of environmental rights. Therefore, the Constitutional Court is encouraged to adopt a progressive constitutional interpretation that reconceptualizes sovereignty as a protective constitutional obligation (state obligation) encompassing transnational dimensions, in order to ensure the effective fulfillment of citizens’ environmental rights.
Co-Authors Rafli Akbar Rabbani Rena Zulfaidah Riva Nurkania Soraya Salimah