Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Pemuliaan Keadilan
Fadhilatul Amaliya
Universitas Tidar
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Pertanggungjawaban PT. Lapindo Brantas Berdasarkan Aspek Responsibility Theory dengan UU No 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Fadhilatul Amaliya; Anindya Rahma Fathiya; Tiara Jelita Andalusianti Roozan; Isna Nurul Hasanah; Dewi Sekar Pembayun
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.7635

Abstract

The Lapindo Brantas case is the largest environmental disaster in Indonesia, causing significant environmental damage and widespread economic and social impacts on the surrounding community. This incident sparked debate about corporate legal responsibility for the damage that occurred. This study aims to thoroughly evaluate the responsibility of the Lapindo Brantas corporation using the responsibility theory approach and Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. The methods used are normative with case studies and legislative analysis to understand the mechanism of corporate legal responsibility in the context of environmental disasters. The findings of this study indicate that corporations can be held criminally liable for environmental damage, and in the case of Lapindo Brantas, the company bears legal responsibility in accordance with the principle of strict liability as stipulated in Law Number 32 of 2009. This study emphasizes the urgency of applying the principle of corporate responsibility as an important part of environmental law enforcement in Indonesia.
Retorika Masyarakat Terkait Undang-undang nomor 15 tahun 2003 jo Undang-undang nomor 5 Tahun 2018 Terhadap Penerapan Mala in se/Mala Per se Sebagai Kebijakan Integratif Tindak Pidana Khusus Terorisme di Indonesia Fadhilatul Amaliya; Anindya Rahma Fathiya; Dewi Sekar Pembayun; Devina Angelica
Pemuliaan Keadilan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): April : Pemuliaan Keadilan
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/pk.v2i2.589

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of mala in se and mala per se concepts in the counter-terrorism policy in Indonesia, based on Law Number 15 of 2003 in conjunction with Law Number 5 of 2018. Terrorism is categorized as an extraordinary crime that causes serious harm both nationally and internationally. This research employs a literature review and normative legal approach to analyze the application of criminal law norms within the context of human rights protection. The findings show that terrorism, as a mala in se offense, requires a comprehensive legal approach that prioritizes not only national security but also the protection of civil rights. The enforcement of anti-terrorism laws, if applied too broadly and harshly, may violate the principles of due process and substantive justice. Therefore, counter-terrorism efforts must be based on the pro justitia principle, supported by independent oversight and active civil society participation to prevent abuse of power and maintain the integrity of the legal system.
Co-Authors Anindya Rahma Fathiya Devina Angelica Dewi Sekar Pembayun Isna Nurul Hasanah Tiara Jelita Andalusianti Roozan