Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Co-Value : Jurnal Ekonomi, Koperasi & Kewirausahaan Journal of Digital Business and Marketing
Oktofa Yudha Sudrajad
Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Financial Health Analysis and Bankruptcy Prediction of BUMN Karya Listed on IDX in The Midst of Increasing Government Infrastructure Projects Based on The National Medium-Term Development Planning (RPJMN 2020 - 2024) Akila Badzlina Putri; Ana Noveria; Oktofa Yudha Sudrajad
Co-Value Jurnal Ekonomi Koperasi dan kewirausahaan Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024): Co-Value: Jurnal Ekonomi, Koperasi & Kewirausahaan
Publisher : Program Studi Manajemen Institut Manajemen Koperasi Indonesia Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/covalue.v15i01.4437

Abstract

Concerning the increase in the national infrastructure budget by 6% from the previous year, as well as the emphasis on infrastructure reflected in the RPJMN 2020 – 2024 document, the government has once again appointed construction State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN Karya) as the drivers of national development. Unfortunately, over the past five years, the financial condition of BUMN Karya has deteriorated. Additionally, several directors within these companies have been implicated in corruption cases, damaging the public image and trust in BUMN Karya. This led the IDX to suspend trading in one of its stocks in May 2023. This study aims to evaluate the financial performance and health condition of BUMN Karya listed on the IDX, namely WSKT, WIKA, PTPP, and ADHI. The research methodology is based on the Ministry of SOEs No decree. KEP-100/MBU/2002. Furthermore, this study predicts the financial distress faced by these BUMN Karya from 2019 to 2023 using four methods: Altman Z-Score, Ohlson O-Score, Zmijewski, and Springate The findings indicate the health conditions of each company from 2019 to 2023 as follows: WSKT (BB, CCC, B, BB, B), WIKA (AA, BB, BB, B, CCC), PTPP (BBB, BB, BBB, B), and ADHI (BBB, B, BB, BB, BBB). Among the four predictive methods, the Altman Z-Score model most closely approximates the actual condition in 2024 with an accuracy rate of 65%. The results show that all four SOEs experienced a decline in their Altman Z-Score in 2023. This study complements previous research with a different approach and provides additional insights into the government’s push for infrastructure development and efforts to improve and strengthen the financial condition of BUMN Karya.  
Choosing the most suitable sustainability report standard for banking industry: A case study of Bank ABC Chintia Rudiyanto; Oktofa Yudha Sudrajad
Journal of Digital Business and Marketing Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): August
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jdbm.v1i2.3326

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate and prioritize sustainability reporting standards in the banking sector by identifying key criteria influencing their selection, with a particular focus on integrating local regulatory compliance and global best practices. Research Methodology: The research employs a mixed-methods approach, beginning with qualitative interviews with key stakeholders and a literature review to identify relevant criteria. Insights from this phase inform the quantitative analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Five sustainability reporting experts from ABC Bank served as respondents, assessing alternative standards based on predetermined criteria derived from both interviews and literature studies. Results: The findings indicate that “integration with financial metrics” and “use of technology” are the most critical criteria in selecting sustainability reporting standards. AHP analysis shows that while POJK 51 meets regulatory requirements, global frameworks such as GRI and SASB offer broader and more investor-oriented disclosures. Combining multiple standards provides a more comprehensive approach, though it demands greater resources and capacity. Conclusion: The study concludes that hybrid adoption of local and global sustainability frameworks enhances reporting credibility, aligns with stakeholder expectations, and strengthens competitive positioning Limitations: The small sample size of five experts from a single bank limits the generalizability of findings. Contribution: This research provides empirical insights into the prioritization of sustainability reporting standards, offering practical guidance for banks and policymakers seeking to enhance ESG transparency and alignment with both domestic regulations and international standards.
Co-Authors Akila Badzlina Putri Ana Noveria Chintia Rudiyanto