Darius A Kian
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Penjatuhan Hukuman di Bawah Ancaman Pidana Minimum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pemerasan oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS) di Pelabuhan Kelas III Larantuka Nusa Tenggara Timur : (Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kupang Nomor 17/Pid.Sus-TPK/2017/Pn.Kpg) Yunitra Marlinda Mau; Orpa G Manuain; Darius A Kian
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v2i2.3011

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the imposition of penalties under the minimum criminal threat against perpetrators of corruption extortion by civil servants (PNS) at the Class III port of Larantuka, East Nusa Tenggara (Case study: Kupang District Court Decision Number 17/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2017/Pn.Kpg). This research is a normative juridical research which means that the author does not use samples and data collection is carried out by the library method, with the object of study. After the data is obtained, the author will analyze juridically normative data obtained on the object of study. The corruption case of I Wayan Adisucipto SN was proven to have violated Article 12 letter e Jo Article 12 A of Law No. 31 of 1999 jo Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption, which states a maximum of 20 years in prison or life imprisonment and a minimum of 4 years, but in reality the judge imposed a prison sentence of only 5 months, the decision imposed by the judge that is not considered according to / based on the law will be null and void. The imposition of a 5-month sentence for the defendant by the judge in Number: 17/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2017/Pn.Kpg is not in accordance with the punishment system. From this research, the author can conclude that the Judge's consideration is not based on the provisions of the legislation, namely Article 12 letter e jo Article 12 A Paragraph (2) of Law No. 31 of 1999 Jo Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption which is a minimum imprisonment of at least 4 (four) years and a maximum of 20 (twenty) years so that it is contrary to the applicable law.
Pelaksanaan dan Hambatan dalam Pemberian Remisi terhadap Warga Binaan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Kupang Aditya Joshua Panggalaha; Rudepel Petrus Leo; Darius A Kian
Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Oktober : Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konstitusi.v1i4.194

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation and obstacles in granting remission to prisoners in Class II A Kupang Correctional Institution. This research is empirical juridical research, which is a type of sociological legal research that examines the applicable legal provisions and has occurred in community life with the type of data used is primary data obtained through interviews and documentation, and secondary data that provides information and is complementary to the primary. The data is analyzed descriptively-qualitatively. The research was conducted at Class II A Kupang Correctional Institution. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the implementation of the granting of remission at the Class II A Kupang Correctional Institution is that Remission is a reduction in the period of serving a sentence given to prisoners and children in conflict with the law (children) who meet the requirements in the legislation. The obstacles faced by Kupang Class II A Correctional Institution in the implementation of remission are administrative factors, institutional factors, facilities and infrastructure factors.