Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Tawakal and Life Optimism for Divorced Married Couples: A Case Study in Medan, Satria Village, Bekasi City, West Java Province Alifatuzzahroh, Wafa; Tasman, Alfadhli
El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Vol 6, No 2 (2023): El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/ujhk.v6i2.20000

Abstract

Marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman that is commanded in Islam. Among the purposes of marriage is to meet the various primary needs of human beings so that they can lead a better, calm and purposeful life (litaskunu ilaiha). However, along the way, there are often various problems that in some cases lead to divorce or separation. Divorce occurs due to various problems in the marriage, causing trauma, depression, loss of optimism in life and so on. The various negative impacts of divorce must certainly be faced in various ways so that the person concerned can rise from all the lags to continue to realize various plans and targets in his life. This research uses empirical legal methods using Islamic legal approaches as an analytical tool. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and documentation studies, interviews with informants of divorced parties both husband and wife. The informants in this study consisted of 5 people distinguished by 3 females and 2 males. The research concludes that trust is an important instrument in increasing faith after divorce. The majority of respondents said that putting their trust in post-divorce can increase faith. The informant said that post-divorce trust has an important role in strengthening self-mentality, increasing resilience, and building a positive mindset.
Mahabbah In The Perspective of Rabi'ah Al-Adawiyah and Ibn Taimiyah Tasman, Alfadhli; Hadi, Mahfudz Syamsul
Abdurrauf Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Abdurrauf Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Syekh Abdur Rauf Aceh Singkil, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58824/arjis.v3i3.172

Abstract

This research focuses on the study of the concept of mahabbah (love according to sufism) according to Rabiah al-Adawiyah and Ibn Taimiyah. This research is an attempt to find out how the understanding of the thoughts, similarities and differences in the thoughts of the two figures in understanding mahabbah, especially mahabbah to Allah. Such as the meaning of mahabbah, types of mahabbah, object of mahabbah, and purpose of mahabbah. This research is library research, namely research conducted using data collection from various literatures. The approach used is historical-philosophical and the data collection method was carried out by the documentation method which was analyzed using the descriptive-comparative analysis method. The research data consists of primary data and secondary data. The results of the study show that mahabbah according to Rabiah al-Adawiyah is striped in a vertical direction, namely mahabbah which is only addressed to Allah SWT. regardless of other beings, rewards and punishments. Meanwhile, according to Ibn Taimiyah, mahabbah is striped in a horizontal direction, namely mahabbah which is addressed to Allah SWT. without having to turn his eyes to other beings, rewards and punishments. This is because mahabbah for creatures if it is based on Allah and cares about rewards and punishments is a manifestation of mahabbah for Allah. Although there are differences in the concept of mahabbah between the two, there are also similarities where both of them are of the view that only Allah SWT is the goal, because the one who has the right to receive mahabbah is the one who gives the sense of mahabbah itself. Thus mahabbah is only addressed to God. [Penelitian ini berfokus pada kajian konsep mahabbah (cinta menurut sufisme) menurut Rabiah al-Adawiyah dan Ibnu Taimiyah. Penelitian ini merupakan upaya untuk mengetahui bagaimana pemahaman pikiran, persamaan dan perbedaan pikiran kedua tokoh dalam memahami mahabbah, khususnya mahabbah kepada Allah. Seperti arti ma?abbah, jenis-jenis mahabbah, objek mahabbah, dan tujuan mahabbah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan, yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan pengumpulan data dari berbagai literatur. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah historis-filosofis dan metode pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan metode dokumentasi yang dianalisis menggunakan metode deskriptif-komparatif. Data penelitian terdiri dari data primer dan data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mahabbah menurut Rabiah al-Adawiyah bergaris dalam arah vertikal, yaitu mahabbah yang hanya ditujukan kepada Allah SWT. terlepas dari makhluk lain, hadiah dan hukuman. Sementara itu, menurut Ibnu Taimiyah, mahabbah bergaris arah horizontal, yaitu mahabbah yang ditujukan kepada Allah SWT. tanpa harus mengalihkan pandangannya ke makhluk lain, hadiah dan hukuman. Hal ini dikarenakan mahabbah bagi makhluk, jika didasarkan pada Allah dan peduli dengan pahala dan hukuman adalah perwujudan mahabbah bagi Allah. Meskipun ada perbedaan konsep mahabbah antara keduanya, ada juga kesamaan dimana keduanya berpandangan bahwa hanya Allah SWT yang menjadi tujuannya, karena orang yang berhak menerima mahabbah adalah orang yang memberikan pengertian ma?abbah itu sendiri. Dengan demikian ma?abbah hanya ditujukan kepada Tuhan].
Mapping Philosophical Theories and Methods in Undergraduate Theses at UIN Jakarta: Trends, Approaches, and Contemporary Challenges Tasman, Alfadhli; Iman, Muhamad Tamamul; Irawan, Bambang; Imaduddin, Muhammad
Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/fuaduna.v9i1.9664

Abstract

This study examines how philosophy is practiced within the context of Islamic higher education by mapping the theories, methodologies, and approaches found in undergraduate theses at the Faculty of Ushuluddin, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. The research aims to provide an overview of how students engage with classical and contemporary philosophical frameworks to address issues such as globalization, modernity, and pluralism. Adopting a qualitative descriptive design, this study analyzes a corpus of student theses to identify dominant theoretical orientations and methodological tendencies. The findings reveal that Islamic epistemology, ethics, and metaphysics are the most frequently applied theoretical domains. Methodologically, textual analysis and doctrinal approaches dominate, while comparative and hermeneutical methods appear as complementary strategies. Other approaches, including historical, socio-cultural, and ethnographic perspectives, are less common, yet normative-philosophical analysis remains the most prevalent overall. These results suggest that while students demonstrate awareness of contemporary challenges, their engagement is mediated through traditional Islamic philosophical frameworks. This study contributes to discussions on philosophy pedagogy in Islamic higher education and highlights the need for broader methodological diversity to respond effectively to current intellectual and societal issues.