Dionisio Ximenes, Jose
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Describe The Opinion of Midwives on The Participation of Father/Family as Humanization Strategy of Care During Labor of Women Cared for at Clinic Vera Cruz, Dili, Timor-Leste Jose Tilman, Etelvina; Monteiro, Ermelinda; Pereira, Natalia; de Deus, Elisa; de Carvalho, Eugenia; Dionisio Ximenes, Jose
Jurnal KESANS : Kesehatan dan Sains Vol 3 No 1 (2023): KESANS: International Journal of Health and Science
Publisher : Rifa'Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54543/kesans.v3i1.243

Abstract

Introduction: According to the World Health Organization (WHO, 2005) a normal delivery is the process in which labor begins spontaneously (the birth canal) with a low-risk index at the beginning of the work and cephalic presentation, a pregnancy between 37-42 weeks. After birth mother and baby remain in good condition. Objectives: To describe the opinion of midwives on the participation of father / family as humanization strategy of care during labor of women cared for at Clinica Vera Cruz, Dili, Timor-Leste. This is an exploratory and descriptive study with a qualitative approach, using semi structured interviews. Method: The total number of this health center midwives is 17. The sample consisted of the midwives who perform functions in maternal and fetal health to mothers. Results and Discussion: All midwives consider important the father attend the birth, favoring humanized care to women in labor, lessens the trauma of childbirth and the use of medicalization. The involvement of the father in childbirth contributes to their psychoactive preparation for better recovery of women, promotes the involvement of the couple in promoting the health of the mother and baby. Humanized births are quicker and develop more naturally. Conclusion: This research is beneficial to the women and for caregivers responsible for decision-making in the health center of Vera Cruz, especially midwives. The involvement of the father in normal birth is consensus as great benefit to the tirade (father, child & mother) with many advantages for the provision of humanized maternal and child care and to humanize the time of delivery and reduce the trauma and the hospital stay associated with it.
Analyze Factors, Based of Midwife’s Perspective, That Influenced Pre-Natal Visits at Public Health Center Pereira, Natalia; Carvalho de Araujo, Eugénia; da Costa Monteiro, Ermelinda; Jose Tilman, Etelvina; Dionisio Ximenes, Jose; Oqui, Maximiano
Jurnal KESANS : Kesehatan dan Sains Vol 3 No 5 (2024): KESANS: International Journal of Health and Science
Publisher : Rifa'Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54543/kesans.v3i5.274

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy is a period of growth and development of embryo inside women. Some risk factors of the maternal mortality are related to the lack of women (mothers)’s participation in the consultation of the pre-natal care.  Objective: of this thesis was to analyze factors, based of midwife’s perspective, that influenced pre-natal visits at Public Health Center of Comoro, Dili district.  Method: used for this study was descriptive study and qualitative approach, and used a questioner for midwives in CHC Comoro. Result and Discussion: Data from Comoro health center; average age of midwives: 37, Majority education: Diploma I, Prenatal consultation importance: very important (100%), Prenatal consultation disclosure importance: very important (70%), Midwives' opinion on the factors of late visits of pregnant women: lack of knowledge of prenatal care (85%), Aspects considered important during the pre-natal consultation visit: tests for Sexually Transmitted Diseases and medical referral if positive (70%), Types of pre-natal consultation disclosures considered adequate: health education measures with the population (90%). Conclusion: My current job requires me to address a range of challenges and enables me to understand the importance of inquiry in the field of maternal health and midwifery and to understand the application of its outcomes that can drive positive change in midwifery care and teaching practice
Difference in Secondary Effects Between AstraZeneca Vaccine and Sinovac Vaccine for Females Aged 18 and above in 2023 Costa Monteiro, Ermelinda da; Costa Neto, Sandra da; Dionisio Ximenes, Jose; Conceição Matos, Livio da; Carvalho de Araújo, Eugenia; Soares Tilman, Etelvina Jose
Jurnal KESANS : Kesehatan dan Sains Vol 3 No 7 (2024): KESANS: International Journal of Health and Science
Publisher : Rifa'Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54543/kesans.v3i7.289

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a severe impact on health, economy, and society worldwide. According to WHO, COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective in protecting individuals from the risk of severe COVID-19 disease and death. COVID-19 vaccines have received   Emergency Use Listing (EUL) and Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) licenses. According World in Data, 53.8% of the global population has received the first dose of COVID-19 vaccination, with 7 million doses provided globally. Timor Leste has vaccine coverage of 78% and 65.1% for the first and second doses of AstraZeneca and 6.3% and 5.9% for Sinovac. Objective: To determine the difference in the secondary effects of AstraZeneca and Sinovac vaccines for females aged 18 or older in Becora village, Cristo Rei administrative post, Dili municipality, in the year 2023. Method: A quantitative analytical method with a cross sectional approach was used with a total sample population of 325 female respondents aged 18 or older who had received the AstraZeneca or Sinovac vaccines. Results and Discussion: Out of the 325 female respondents, 173 (53.2%) received the AstraZeneca vaccine, and 152 (46.8%) received the Sinovac vaccine. 142 (82.1%) of the AstraZeneca vaccine recipients and 92 (60.5%) of the Sinovac vaccine recipients experienced side effects classified as mild. 89 (51.4%) of the AstraZeneca vaccine recipients reported lower body pain. The Sinovac vaccine accounts for 44 (28.9%) of the total. The statistical test results show that there is a significant difference in secondary effects between the AstraZeneca and Sinovac vaccines (p value: 0.000) in cotton thread. The secondary effects in the body are different between the AstraZeneca and Sinovac vaccines (p value: 0.000). Conclusion: Based on the results from female respondents aged 18 and above who have received COVID-19 vaccines, it shows that there is a difference in secondary effects between the AstraZeneca and Sinovac vaccines.