Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia
See, Benedictus Renny
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PERANAN HUKUM SEBAGAI SARANA PEMBAHARUAN MASYARAKAT MENUJU MASYARAKAT INDONESIA YANG SADAR HUKUM See, Benedictus Renny
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (378.832 KB) | DOI: 10.30588/jhcj.v1i1.700

Abstract

Hukum adalah subsistem dalam sistem kehidupan bangsa dan negara. Hukum bertujuan untuk menciptakan keadilan, ketertiban dan kepastian hukum di masyarakat. Namun dalam perkembangannya saat ini hukum tidak hanya bertujuan untuk mencapai keadilan, ketertiban dan kepastian hukum tetapi juga diinstruksikan sebagai alat untuk perubahan sosial. Undang-undang diharapkan memiliki peran optimal untuk mendorong perubahan yang mengarah pada pembaruan orang Indonesia yang sadar akan hukum. Untuk pencapaian masyarakat Indonesia yang sadar akan hukum, perlu ada reformasi di bidang hukum, yaitu melalui; Peningkatan Sistem Pendidikan; Menghidupkan Kembali Budaya Hukum; Penegakan Hukum (Penegakan Hukum); Contoh dari Administrator Negara (Pemerintah); dan peran media massa, yaitu dalam bentuk sosialisasi nilai-nilai hukum dengan memilih pertunjukan yang inspiratif, selektif dan berbobot sehingga mereka akan menghasilkan generasi yang sadar akan hukum.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Nasabah dan Bank Terhadap Tindak Kejahatan Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime) See, Benedictus Renny
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (351.938 KB) | DOI: 10.30588/jhcj.v2i1.1035

Abstract

Banks as intermediary institutions and trust institutions as the driving force of a country's economy, in their activities, cannot be separated from the use of information technology to support their operations. The use of information technology by banks in addition to having a positive impact also has a negative impact that will threaten and harm the bank and its customers, if not managed properly. Banking crimes that use information technology, especially against bank products and services that use computers and internet networks (Cybercrime) will cause losses to customers and the bank itself.This research is normative juridical research that is descriptive-analytical with a case approach to identify and analyze forms of crime in the banking world and the efforts made by the government CQ. financial authorities in providing legal protection for customers and banks from criminals who use information technology.The results of this study indicate that cybercrime is a crime using information technology that can be carried out without recognizing territorial boundaries and no direct interaction between perpetrators and victims of crime is required; so that the government, as well as the monetary authority (BI) and the Financial Services Authority (OJK) as supervisors in the financial and banking sectors, need to protect the public (customers) and banking institutions, namely by taking preventive and repressive actions by implementing existing laws and regulations and coordinating with law enforcement officers in preventing the occurrence of Cybercrime and providing severe penalties for the perpetrators of these crimes. 
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen dan Pemegang Merek Terdaftar dari Pemanfaatan Merek Terkenal See, Benedictus Renny
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (192.974 KB) | DOI: 10.30588/jhcj.v2i2.1403

Abstract

The tendency of consumers to buy and use famous brands is a lifestyle for some people in this modern era. Considering that generally goods/services of well-known brands have a relatively more expensive sale value when compared to non-branded goods/services, so their existence is often used by parties who are not responsible for producing counterfeit goods/ services or selling counterfeit goods/services with us and utilize well-known brands. Therefore the use of a well-known trademark that has been registered by another unauthorized party will bring legal impact and loss to many parties, the first party that loses is the owner of the registered brand, and this will lead to fraudulent competition, the second party to be disadvantaged is the consumer community who buy and consume counterfeit products using well-known brands which should be protected from misleading behavior, other parties who are also disadvantaged by the use of well-known brands are the government/country in addition to not getting fees from the distribution of these well-known brands will also affect the country's image from the international business environment. In this study, the author tries to find out how the form of legal protection against "Famous brand holders" and against "Cosmetics" from the illegal use of famous brands and what needs to be done by the government to protect the practice of using registered (well-known) brands from the use of parties who are not entitled to.
Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Penetapan Sebagai Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerja Sama (Justice Collaborator) pada Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia See, Benedictus Renny
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30588/jhcj.v4i1.1837

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the laws and regulations governing the legal position and role of justice collaborators, especially regarding the criteria for a person to be designated as a justice collaborator and what is the limit of legal reduction for a justice collaborator. This research is a normative juridical research that is descriptive and analytical, using a legislative approach related to the role and position of justice collaborators in corruption crimes. Data is obtained through document studies and analyzed using qualitative normative methods.Based on the results of the research, it is known that the determination of a person to be able to serve as a Justice Collaborator has not been expressly regulated in the Criminal Code or laws and regulations governing corruption crimes and there are no rules governing the amount of sentence reduction that can be received by a justice collaborator. The suggestion of this research is the need for a special regulation on justice collaborators which regulates the determination as a cooperating whistleblower (justice collaborator), especially about the definition of “Main Perpetrator” and the need for a clear determination of the amount of sentence reduction that can be given to a justice collaborator as a guideline for law enforcers in determining a person as a justice collaborator in a corruption case.
Co-Authors