Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Predicting Conversion to Open Cholecystectomy: A Validation Study of the Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Scoring System Muhammad Hafidh Komar; Imanuddin, Kiagus Ahmad; Theodorus
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 12 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v8i12.1137

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for managing symptomatic gallstone disease. However, a subset of patients requires conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC) due to intraoperative difficulties. The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy scoring system (DLCSS) has been proposed to predict the likelihood of conversion. This study aimed to validate the DLCSS in a single-center setting and assess its predictive accuracy for conversion to OC. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent LC at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital Palembang, Indonesia, between January and December 2023. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. The DLCSS was calculated for each patient, and its correlation with conversion to OC was analyzed using statistical methods. Results: A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The conversion rate to OC was 3.3%. Statistical analysis revealed a weak negative correlation between the DLCSS and conversion to OC (r = -0.318, p = 0.087), suggesting that higher DLCSS scores were associated with a slightly increased likelihood of conversion, although this association was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The DLCSS demonstrated limited predictive value for conversion to OC in our single-center study. Further research with larger sample sizes and diverse patient populations is needed to confirm the utility of the DLCSS in predicting conversion and to identify additional factors that may contribute to intraoperative difficulties during LC.
Integrating the Colon Leakage Score (CLS) and Serum Albumin to Predict Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study in an Indonesian Cohort Muhammad Rizqi Firyal; Muhammad Hafidh Komar; Theodorus
Sriwijaya Journal of Surgery Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Sriwijaya Journal of Surgery
Publisher : Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/sjs.v8i2.132

Abstract

Introduction: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a devastating complication in colorectal surgery, associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Accurate preoperative risk stratification is essential for guiding clinical decision-making. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a synergistic model combining the clinical Colon Leakage Score (CLS) with the biochemical marker of preoperative serum albumin for predicting AL in an Indonesian patient cohort. Methods: A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. The study included 60 patients who underwent resection and primary anastomosis for colorectal cancer between January 2022 and June 2024. Patients who received a diverting stoma were excluded. A "high-risk" status was defined by a composite criterion: a CLS > 11 and a preoperative serum albumin level < 3.5 g/dL. The primary outcome was clinically significant AL. Following the identification of inconsistencies in the initial analysis, a complete data re-analysis was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and overall accuracy, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated. Results: The incidence of AL was 21.7% (13/60 patients). A striking 71.7% of the cohort presented with preoperative hypoalbuminemia. The analysis revealed that the combined model demonstrated poor sensitivity of 46.2% (95% CI: 19.2% - 74.9%) but excellent specificity of 97.9% (95% CI: 88.7% - 99.9%). The model yielded a high PPV of 85.7% (95% CI: 42.1% - 99.6%) and a robust NPV of 86.8% (95% CI: 75.0% - 94.6%). The overall accuracy was 86.7%. Conclusion: The combined CLS-albumin model functions as a highly specific "rule-in" test, not a general screening tool. While it fails to identify more than half of the patients who will leak, a positive result correctly identifies a small subset of patients at extremely high risk for anastomotic leakage. The findings also highlight a profound baseline burden of malnutrition in this population, which warrants further investigation and clinical attention.
Predicting Conversion to Open Cholecystectomy: A Validation Study of the Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Scoring System Muhammad Hafidh Komar; Imanuddin, Kiagus Ahmad; Theodorus
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research Vol. 8 No. 12 (2024): Bioscientia Medicina: Journal of Biomedicine & Translational Research
Publisher : HM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v8i12.1137

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for managing symptomatic gallstone disease. However, a subset of patients requires conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC) due to intraoperative difficulties. The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy scoring system (DLCSS) has been proposed to predict the likelihood of conversion. This study aimed to validate the DLCSS in a single-center setting and assess its predictive accuracy for conversion to OC. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent LC at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital Palembang, Indonesia, between January and December 2023. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. The DLCSS was calculated for each patient, and its correlation with conversion to OC was analyzed using statistical methods. Results: A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The conversion rate to OC was 3.3%. Statistical analysis revealed a weak negative correlation between the DLCSS and conversion to OC (r = -0.318, p = 0.087), suggesting that higher DLCSS scores were associated with a slightly increased likelihood of conversion, although this association was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The DLCSS demonstrated limited predictive value for conversion to OC in our single-center study. Further research with larger sample sizes and diverse patient populations is needed to confirm the utility of the DLCSS in predicting conversion and to identify additional factors that may contribute to intraoperative difficulties during LC.