Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Experience of Some Countries of The Commonwealth of Nations in Ensuring Criminological Protection of Justice Khrystova, Yuliia; Titarenkо, Oleksiy; Cherviakov, Oleksandr; Marushchak, Oleksandr; Shkolа, Serhіi
Khazanah Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2024): Khazanah Hukum Vol 6, No 1 April (2024)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v6i1.33619

Abstract

The article describes the experience of Great Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand in the field of criminological protection of justice. A combination of philosophical, general scientific and specific scientific research methods was used in the preparation of this article to find out which special actors are authorized to carry out such criminological activities, to analyze the powers and guarantees for their exercise to fulfill their tasks. The article reveals the peculiarities of interaction of special actors of ensuring the security of justice with other actors in the system of combating offenses and crimes against justice. The author emphasizes the role of the sheriff, police, and private security companies in ensuring security during the judicial process. The experience of these Commonwealth countries in identifying and counteracting possible threats to the security of justice is analyzed. The purpose of this work was to single out positive foreign experience that may be promising for implementation into the national legislation with the aim of improving activities of the Court Security Service, which is a special subject performing implementation of the function of criminological protection of justice in Ukraine. In particular, firstly, to find out which special entities are authorized to carry out the specified criminological function in certain countries of the British Commonwealth and what powers they have; secondly, what other law enforcement agencies are involved in the mechanism of ensuring criminological protection of justice and what are the features of their interaction with special subjects; thirdly, what measures they take to detect and counter possible threats to the security of justice.
Experience of Individual Northern European Countries in Providing Protection of Justice (Criminological Aspect and Criminal Law Aspect) Khrystova, Yuliia; Khrystov, Oleksandr; Karpenko, Maksym; Shendryk, Vladyslav; Kasapohlu, Svitlana
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 24 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v24i1.12491

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to  describes experience of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden in providing criminological protection of justice. . This article is the qualitative research with a historical and comparative approach. Thus, as of 01 January, 2023, employees of the Court Security Service in Ukraine ensured public order and security in 590 appellate and local courts and bodies of the justice system, which is more than 80% of their total number , and as of 01 January 2024 security was ensured in 639 (87 %) objects of the justice system.  To a large extent, this is related to introduction of restrictions in Ukraine provided for by martial law as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation.The results of the study concluded that the  it has been established that  today in some countries of Northern Europe, in contrast to Ukraine, permanent security checks for all visitors are implemented only in those courts where such checks are needed for security reasons, and implementation of such a criminological function is entrusted to security inspectors represented by police officers, court employees, as well as security companies. Based on the results of the research, promising directions for improving activities of the Court Security Service of Ukraine were determined, and expediency of strategic planning practice in the sphere of ensuring protection of justice in Ukraine was also emphasized.
Legal Regulation Experience of Individual Countries of The European Region Regarding Implementation of International Standards for Ensuring Criminological and Criminal-Legal Protection of Justice Khrystova, Yuliia; Miroshnychenko, Serhiy; Kurbatova, Iryna; Titarenkо, Oleksiy; Maksimentsev, Maksym
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i2.41093

Abstract

The article describes the experience of Germany and Austria in implementing international standards for ensuring criminological and criminal-legal protection of justice. A set of general scientific and specific scientific research methods were used in the preparation of this article to define special subjects authorised to carry out such criminological activities, peculiarities of their interaction with the police and other law enforcement agencies, to reveal the content of legislative mandates regarding organisation and functioning of the Court Security Services and their counterparts, as well as that of the legislation on criminal liability for criminal offences against justice. The purpose of this work is to determine promising directions for increasing the efficiency of implementing criminological and criminal-legal protection of justice by authorised subjects in Ukraine, which has become especially important in the sphere of ensuring national security under martial law, taking into account positive experience of such European region countries as Germany and Austria regarding implementation of international standards recognised by the international community in this area. Based on the results of the research, prospective directions for improving the activity of the Court Security Service of Ukraine, its interaction with the National Police and other subjects of the state sector and non-state sector in the provision of criminological protection of justice, as well as the legislation of Ukraine on criminal liability for criminal offences against justice, taking into account experience of Germany and Austria regarding implementation of standards recognised by the international community in this area.
Experience of Some Countries of The Commonwealth of Nations in Ensuring Criminological Protection of Justice Khrystova, Yuliia; Titarenkо, Oleksiy; Cherviakov, Oleksandr; Marushchak, Oleksandr; Shkolа, Serhіi
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Khazanah Hukum Vol 6, No 1 April (2024)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v6i1.33619

Abstract

The article describes the experience of Great Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand in the field of criminological protection of justice. A combination of philosophical, general scientific and specific scientific research methods was used in the preparation of this article to find out which special actors are authorized to carry out such criminological activities, to analyze the powers and guarantees for their exercise to fulfill their tasks. The article reveals the peculiarities of interaction of special actors of ensuring the security of justice with other actors in the system of combating offenses and crimes against justice. The author emphasizes the role of the sheriff, police, and private security companies in ensuring security during the judicial process. The experience of these Commonwealth countries in identifying and counteracting possible threats to the security of justice is analyzed. The purpose of this work was to single out positive foreign experience that may be promising for implementation into the national legislation with the aim of improving activities of the Court Security Service, which is a special subject performing implementation of the function of criminological protection of justice in Ukraine. In particular, firstly, to find out which special entities are authorized to carry out the specified criminological function in certain countries of the British Commonwealth and what powers they have; secondly, what other law enforcement agencies are involved in the mechanism of ensuring criminological protection of justice and what are the features of their interaction with special subjects; thirdly, what measures they take to detect and counter possible threats to the security of justice.