Kusumawardana, Muhammad Ardi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Metodologi Kontekstual dalam Tafsir Ayat Hukum: Studi Literatur atas Tafsir Klasik dan Kontemporer Kusumawardana, Muhammad Ardi
TSAQOFAH Vol 4 No 6 (2024): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/tsaqofah.v4i6.3877

Abstract

The interpretation of legal verses in the Qur'an undergoes significant methodological dynamics between classical and contemporary mufassirs, which raises issues of relevance and adaptability in the modern social context. This study aims to explore and compare contextual methodologies in the interpretation of legal verses between classical and contemporary periods. The method used is a literature study with a comparative analysis approach to classical interpretations such as Al-Tabari, Al-Qurtubi, and Ibn Kathir and contemporary interpretations such as Quraish Shihab and Abdullah Saeed. The results show that contemporary mufassirs more often use a contextual approach that considers current social and cultural dynamics, while classical mufassirs tend to use a literal textual approach. The findings support the hypothesis that contextual methodology is more relevant and adaptive to social change compared to classical textual methods. This research produces the "Contextual-Textual Tafsir Integration Theory" (CTIT) which offers a synthesis between textual and contextual approaches. The implication of this study is the need for integration between textual and contextual approaches to develop a more holistic and responsive tafsir methodology, which not only maintains the classical intellectual heritage but also meets the needs of modern society.
The Tradition of Celebrating the Birthday of Prophet Muhammad Reception of Wetu Telu Adherents in Bayan Village, North Lombok Regency, Regarding Mah}abbah in Surah Ali Imran, Verse 31 Kusumawardana, Muhammad Ardi; Tyas, Baiq Ayu Darma Ning
Jurnal Ushuluddin Vol 33, No 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/jush.v33i1.35793

Abstract

Wetu Telu is a belief system and religious practice still observed by some Sasak Muslims in Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara. The purpose of this study is to identify the forms of practice and understanding related to the acceptance of mah}abbah among Wetu Telu adherents and to explore the arguments supporting this acceptance. The research questions addressed in this study include: What is the general meaning of mah}abbah in the Qur'an? How do Wetu Telu Muslims in Bayan Village celebrate the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad (Prophet's Birthday)? What are the patterns of acceptance and the goals of Wetu Telu adherents in interpreting mah}abbah based on Surah Ali 'Imran, verse 31? This study employs a qualitative descriptive method. The qualitative approach involves gathering information in a natural setting using scientific methods. Meanwhile, the descriptive method seeks to describe a specific object or historical event, followed by an effort to draw general conclusions based on historical facts-one of which is conducted through interviews. The findings of this study indicate that the reception of mah}abbah among Wetu Telu adherents, as reflected in Surah Ali 'Imran verse 31, manifests in a different form of love compared to mainstream Muslims in its application. Wetu Telu adherents integrate local cultural traditions and perform rituals in their religious activities. In applying the theoretical framework of this study, the encoding process refers to Sunan Prapen, who introduced the Qur'an to Wetu Telu followers through Sufi mystical teachings. As a result, cultural syncretism remains prevalent among its adherents today. Meanwhile, the decoding or reception pattern of mah}abbah varies: a small portion of adherents accept the meaning of the Qur'anic text in its entirety, known as hegemonic dominance, while the majority contextualise the text, a process referred to as negotiation