Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Various Methods of Strengthening Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joint Subjected Earthquake-Type Loading Using Fibre-Reinforced Polymers: A Critical Review Ridwan, Ridwan; Jemaa, Yaser; Yuniarto, Enno
Journal of Applied Materials and Technology Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): March 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Engineering Universitas Riau and Applied Materials and Technology Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31258/Jamt.4.2.42-55

Abstract

Fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites are extensively employed in concrete technology due to their exceptional mechanical strength and durability.  They serve a dual purpose, not only reinforcing damaged elements but also supporting heavier service loads and addressing long-term concerns in new infrastructure projects. Consequently, the objective of this review is to establish a comprehensive research database that focuses on evaluating the strengthening behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) beam-column joints (BCJ) under earthquake loads through diverse types and application methods of FRP composites. The efficacy of these strengthening techniques is assessed by considering factors such as the loading capacity and dissipated energy of RC BCJ versus the joint confinement index provided by the fibre in the joint area. Through this state-of-the-art review, it becomes evident that FRP composites effectively enhanced the normalized load of specimens up to 27 kN/?MPa and enhanced the dissipated energy until 558.6 kN-mm for the case of specimens with a lower confinement index, less than 0.3. Additionally, the specimen strengthened with the deep embedment (DE) method resulted in a moderate normalized load and dissipated energy compared to those strengthened with the external bonded (EB) method. The test results indicated that the average normalized load and dissipated energy of the DE-strengthening method was 93% and 28.5% compared to that of the EB-strengthening method. These findings reveal that FRP composites offer distinct advantages in terms of load capacity and dissipated energy when used for strengthening earthquake-affected RC BCJ. Finally, based on the compilation of the previous works, this research proposes several techniques for utilizing FRP composites to enhance RC BCJ subjected to earthquake load.
Finite Element-Based Validation of Infill Wall Material Model for Seismic Response Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames Ridwan, Ridwan; Wulandari, Chrisfella; Jemaa, Yaser; Wanda Putri, T. Sy. Zahiyyah Aini; Salsabila, Elsa Attila; Yuniarto, Enno; Kamaldi, Alfian
Journal of Applied Materials and Technology Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Engineering Universitas Riau and Applied Materials and Technology Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31258/Jamt.7.2.58-65

Abstract

Masonry infill walls are commonly used in reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings for both architectural and environmental reasons.  Although many consider RC systems to be non-structural, their interaction with surrounding frames can have a significant impact on their lateral stiffness, strength, and seismic performance. This can lead to stiffness issues and soft-story failures during earthquakes. This study looks at the structural function of masonry infills. It compares the experimental load-displacement backbone curve of an infilled RC frame with numerical predictions from four well-known Equivalent Diagonal Strut (EDS) models: Holmes, Mainstone, Liau and Kwan, and Paulay and Priestley. We looked at how well the models performed for both serviceability (initial stiffness) and ultimate limit states (peak lateral strength). The findings demonstrate a definite trade-off in predictive accuracy. With a mean stiffness ratio of 1.38, the Mainstone model yielded the most accurate estimate of elastic stiffness. The Holmes and Liau and Kwan models, on the other hand, significantly overestimated stiffness (ratio = 1.92). All models were conservative (ratios < 1.0) for peak strength. Holmes and Liau and Kwan produced the closest predictions (ratio = 0.84), while Mainstone was the most conservative (ratio = 0.80). These results indicate that the best choice of EDS model depends on the design goal: Mainstone is better for serviceability assessments, while Holmes and Liau and Kwan provide more realistic predictions for ultimate lateral capacity.