Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AML/CFT Journal The Journal of Anti Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Yanuar, Muh Afdal
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Diskrepansi Antara Objek Kewajiban Pelaporan Bagi Bank Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Pencucian Uang Dengan Yang Wajib Dirahasiakan Berdasarkan Ketentuan Anti-Tipping Off Yanuar, Muh Afdal
AML/CFT Journal : The Journal Of Anti Money Laundering And Countering The Financing Of Terrorism Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Money Laundering in General Election, Digital Currency, and Terrorism Financing
Publisher : Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59593/amlcft.2023.v2i1.73

Abstract

Based on anti-tipping off provisions, the object that must be kept confidential by the reporting party (inter alias, the Bank) is information related to Suspicious Transactions Report (STR). Meanwhile, things that become the object of reporting obligations for banks also include cash financial report (CTR), and international funds transfer instructions (IFTI). This paper will discuss the legal problems that arise and the paradigm that needs to be formed regarding the discrepancy between objects of reporting obligations for banks based on AML laws and objects that must be kept secret under anti-tipping off provisions. This paper was formed using normative research methods with conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches. In this paper it is concluded that: (a) the legal problems that arise related to the issues discussed in this paper are that there are no specific provisions that expressively can be appointed if there is a disclosure of the fact related to CTR or IFTI; and (b) The paradigm that needs to be formed regarding the issues discussed in this paper is that Article 12 of the AML Law (anti-tipping off) is applied to violations of disclosing STR. Meanwhile, for the disclosure of CTR and IFTI, the provision that was applied was Article 11 of the AML Law.
Penyelesaian Konflik Antara Norma Khusus dengan Norma Khusus Lainnya pada Perkara ‘Pencucian Hasil Kejahatan’ Narkotika dan Perusakan Hutan Yanuar, Muh Afdal
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 21, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - September 2024
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v21i3.1053

Abstract

This paper will explain about the conflict of norms that arise because there are 2 (two) similar provisions (offenses) in different laws, related to 'laundering of proceeds of the forest destruction crime ' and 'laundering of proceeds of narcotics crime'. Furthermore, it is also discussed which principles must be applied to resolve the conflict of norms, and which provisions (offenses) must be applied in that case. This paper uses a normative research with a conceptual approach, statutory approach, and case approach. Through this paper it is also concluded that in case of a conflict of norms between special norms and other special norms, the most relevant principle to be applied is the juridische/systematische specialiteit principle, and in the context of the conflict of norms that occurred in case of 'laundering of proceeds of the forest destruction crime ' and 'laundering of proceeds of narcotics crime', the more relevant provision (offense) applied is the 'Money Laundering Offense' as regulated in the Money Laundering Law.Tulisan ini akan membahas terkait dengan konflik norma yang timbul karena terdapat masing-masing 2 (dua) aturan yang mirip pada undang-undang yang berbeda, terkait ‘pencucian hasil kejahatan pengrusakan hutan’ dan ‘pencucian hasil kejahatan narkotika’. Selanjutnya, juga dibahas perihal asas apa yang harus diterapkan untuk menyelesaikan konflik norma tersebut, dan ketentuan (delik) mana yang harus diberlakukan dalam peristiwa hukum tersebut. Tulisan ini menggunakan penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, dan pendekatan kasus. Melalui tulisan ini juga disampaikan bahwa dalam hal terjadi konflik norma antara norma khusus dengan norma khusus lainnya, maka asas yang paling relevan untuk diterapkan adalah asas juridische/systematische specialiteit, dan dalam konteks konflik norma yang terjadi pada perkara ‘pencucian hasil kejahatan pengrusakan hutan’ dan ‘pencucian hasil kejahatan narkotika’, maka ketentuan (delik) yang lebih relevan diterapkan adalah ‘Delik Pencucian Uang’ sebagaimana diatur dalam UU TPPU
Diskrepansi Antara Objek Kewajiban Pelaporan Bagi Bank Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Pencucian Uang Dengan Yang Wajib Dirahasiakan Berdasarkan Ketentuan Anti-Tipping Off Yanuar, Muh Afdal
AML/CFT Journal : The Journal Of Anti Money Laundering And Countering The Financing Of Terrorism Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Money Laundering in General Election, Digital Currency, and Terrorism Financing
Publisher : Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59593/amlcft.2023.v2i1.73

Abstract

Based on anti-tipping off provisions, the object that must be kept confidential by the reporting party (inter alias, the Bank) is information related to Suspicious Transactions Report (STR). Meanwhile, things that become the object of reporting obligations for banks also include cash financial report (CTR), and international funds transfer instructions (IFTI). This paper will discuss the legal problems that arise and the paradigm that needs to be formed regarding the discrepancy between objects of reporting obligations for banks based on AML laws and objects that must be kept secret under anti-tipping off provisions. This paper was formed using normative research methods with conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches. In this paper it is concluded that: (a) the legal problems that arise related to the issues discussed in this paper are that there are no specific provisions that expressively can be appointed if there is a disclosure of the fact related to CTR or IFTI; and (b) The paradigm that needs to be formed regarding the issues discussed in this paper is that Article 12 of the AML Law (anti-tipping off) is applied to violations of disclosing STR. Meanwhile, for the disclosure of CTR and IFTI, the provision that was applied was Article 11 of the AML Law.
Co-Authors