Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Jurisprudential Inquiry Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Teks Editorial Siswa Kelas XII SMA Negeri 2 Tanjung Morawa Kristina Damai Yanti Simorangkir; Syamsul Arif
Jurnal Yudistira : Publikasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan dan Bahasa Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): April : Jurnal Yudistira : Publikasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan dan Bahasa
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/yudistira.v2i2.707

Abstract

This research was carried out with the aim of finding out the effect of the jurisprudential inquiry learning model on the ability to write editorial texts. The population of this study was all class XII of SMA Negeri 2 Tanjung Morawa, totaling 7 classes. The sample was taken with no more than 40 students per class, so class XII Science 2 had 35 students as the experimental class and class XII Science had 34 students as the control class. The instrument used is a test of the ability to write editorial texts. Data measurements were carried out twice, namely measurements in the experimental class and the control class. From the data processing, it shows that the ability to write editorial texts in class .05, standard deviation 13.15. This can be seen in the normality test, the jurisprudential inquiry learning model is Lcount < Ltable namely 0.205 < 0.337. Then in the conventional learning model Lcount < Ltable, namely 0.192 < 0.319. Because Lcount is smaller than Ltable, the two data above are said to be normally distributed. Likewise, the results of the data homogeneity test are Fcount < Ftable , namely 0.54 < 0.56, so the data comes from a homogeneous population. After testing normality and homogeneity, hypothesis testing was carried out, obtained tcount > ttable with hypothesis test results of 6.35 and significance a = 0.05 and df = 35+34-2 = 67, so at the 5% level we obtained ttable = 1.99601. Thus it can be concluded that tcount > ttable , namely 6.35 > 1.99601, so the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. This proves that the jurisprudential inquiry learning model is more influential in improving the editorial text writing skills of class XII students at SMA Negeri 2 Tanjung Morawa.
Analisis Kasus Pencemaran Nama Baik (Pelanggaran UU ITE Dan KUHP) Oleh Artis Medina Zein Terhadap Selebgram Marissya Icha Frinawaty Lestarina Barus; Kristina Damai Yanti Simorangkir; Rysta Vara Nurlette; Rahel Yena Br.Kaban
Protasis: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Desember : Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/protasis.v2i2.109

Abstract

This research analyzes one case of defamation committed by a Media Zein celebrity on social media. Medina Zein was charged with article 27 paragraph (3) of Republic of Indonesia Law number 19 of 2016 concerning ITE. Defamation is one of the problems in forensic linguistics that often occurs in the real world and cyberspace. Defamation or defamation can be done verbally and in writing. The aim is to bring down someone’s good name and/or embarrass others. This research uses a qualitative descriptive research method. This research contains a general, clear picture and is based on facts that occur in the field regarding what is being researched. This research uses data analysis in which there is an explanation of the perpetrator and the crime he committed. The results of this research stated that sister Medina Zein was found guilty and sentenced on charges of defamation with a sentence of 6 months in prison.