Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Peranan UU Minerba sebagai Controls Host State Indonesia terhadap Kedudukan Kontrak Karya PT. Freeport Indonesia (PTFI) dan Negosiasi Menjadi Jalan Keluar Sri Sinduwati
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 5 No. 6 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/10.36312/vol5iss5pp187-201

Abstract

Investment and implementation of mineral and coal mining business activities are regulated by the obligation to nationalize or divest shares in Article 112 of Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Amendments to Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining (UU 3 of 2020). This research aims to analyze the role of the Minerba Law as Indonesia's Controls Host State towards PT. Freeport Indonesia and the position of the Contract of Work. The research method in this paper uses normative-empirical legal research methods. The results of this research are that the provisions of Article 1123 of the Mining and Coal Law regulate that mining business entities whose shares are owned by foreigners are obliged to divest 51% (fifty one) percent of their shares in stages to the central government, regional government, BUMN, regionally owned business entities, and/ or national private business entities. The government's agreement with PT. Freeport Indonesia is related to the divestment of 51% (fifty one percent) shares as one of the strategic schemes that can be implemented under the coordination of the Ministry of BUMN in the acquisition process, namely through the formation of a BUMN Mining holding company where PT. Indonesia Asahan Aluminum (Inalum) will be the holding company.
ROYA PARSIAL HAK TANGGUNGAN RUMAH SUSUN: PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK NORMA DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMBELI Sri Sinduwati
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i1.7137

Abstract

The regulation of partial roya in Indonesian legislation reveals a norm conflict between Article 2 paragraph (2) of the Mortgage Law (UUHT), which requires the inclusion of a partial roya agreement in the Deed of Granting Mortgage (APHT), and Article 124 paragraph (2) of the Minister of Agraria/Head of BPN Regulation No. 3 of 1997, which allows partial roya to be carried out without prior agreement in the APHT. This study aims to analyze the regulation of partial roya for apartment units and the form of legal protection for buyers. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, utilizing the theory of legal hierarchy and the theory of legal protection. The results show that to resolve this norm conflict, the principle of lex superiori derogat legi inferiori is applied, meaning that the higher-ranking provision in the Mortgage Law must prevail. The implementation of partial roya must be agreed upon in advance in the APHT. Legal protection for apartment unit buyers is obtained by including a partial roya clause in the APHT, so that after full payment, the mortgage on the unit can be partially discharged.Keywords: partial roya; apartment unit; mortgage; norm conflict; legal protection