Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Natural Science Education Research (NSER)
Marsi'ah, Siti
Unknown Affiliation
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Education Physics

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
EFEKTIVITAS PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN TOULMIN ARGUMENTATION PATTERN (TAP) BERBASIS MODEL ADI DAN EKSPERIMEN UNTUK MELATIH KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI ILMIAHASED ON THE ADI MODEL AND EXPERIMENTS FOR TRAINING SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILLS Marsi'ah, Siti; Rakhmawan, Aditya; Ahied, Mochammad; Hadi, Wiwin Puspita; Yamin, Yamin
Natural Science Education Research Vol 7, No 2 (2024): Natural Science Education Research
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/nser.v7i2.26285

Abstract

This research aims to determine the effectiveness of the Toulmin Argumentation Pattern (TAP) based on the ADI model and experiments in training scientific argumentation skills. Learning tools include teaching modules, LKPD, infographics and scientific argumentation tests. The development of learning tools uses a 4D development model, which consists of Define, Design, Develop and Disseminate, but in the implementation of this research it only focuses on validation testing at the disseminate stage. The research sample included 15 students in class VIII C at UPTD SMPN 1 Sepulu, who were selected using a purposive sampling technique. Data collection techniques use questionnaires, interviews, observation and documentation. Based on the research results, it was found that the learning tools developed had an average validity of each for the teaching module, namely 95%, LKPD 93%, infographics 92%, scientific argumentation test 92% with very feasible criteria and reliability respectively, namely the teaching module 96 %, LKPD 96%, infographics 96%, and scientific argumentation test questions 95% with very reliable criteria. The results of the N-Gain Score for students' scientific argumentation were 0.7 with high criteria. Average readability is 99% with very readable criteria. The average student response was 92% with very good criteria
Co-Authors Aditya Rakhmawan, Aditya Mochammad Ahied Wiwin Puspita Hadi Yamin, Yamin