Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Journal of Law, Education and Business
Putra, Louis Sebastian Anot
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Proses dan Putusan Kasus Pidana Ferdy Sambo: Studi Kasus 796/Pid.B/2022/PN Jkt. Sel. Putra, Louis Sebastian Anot; Jonathan, Edward; Rasji, Rasji
Journal of Law, Education and Business Vol 2, No 2 (2024): Oktober 2024
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jleb.v2i2.2965

Abstract

Pada tahun 2022, Indonesia dikejutkan oleh kematian Brigadir Nofriansyah Yosua Hutabarat (Brigadir J) yang dilaporkan oleh Brigadir Jenderal Ferdy Sambo. Awalnya, kasus ini dipresentasikan sebagai insiden tembak-menembak antara Brigadir J dan Bharada E. Namun, investigasi lebih lanjut mengungkap bahwa insiden tersebut merupakan hasil rekayasa Ferdy Sambo dan beberapa rekan kerjanya. Metode penelitian yang penulis gunakan dalam menyusun artikel ilmiah ini adalah dengan jenis penelitian normatif dengan memanfaatkan data sekunder dari literatur yang ada untuk menganalisis proses peradilan dari awal hingga putusan di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Ferdy Sambo dan beberapa tersangka lainnya terbukti bersalah atas pembunuhan berencana dan berbagai upaya untuk menghilangkan barang bukti. Ferdy Sambo akhirnya dijatuhi hukuman mati. Kasus ini menyoroti pelanggaran etik dalam penegakan hukum dan mengungkap pentingnya keadilan serta integritas dalam proses peradilan.
China’s Technological Self-Reliance Strategy in Responding to Western Corporate Monopoly and Dominance in the Technology Sector: A Legal Review of Competition Law across Various Legal Instruments: Strategi Kemandirian Teknologi Tiongkok dalam Menghadapi Monopoli dan Dominasi Korporasi Barat di Bidang Teknologi: Suatu Tinjauan Hukum Persaingan Usaha dalam Berbagai Produk Hukum Putra, Louis Sebastian Anot; Lie, Gunardi
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1388

Abstract

Background (General): Western technological dominance has shaped global markets and innovation trajectories, creating structural imbalances in competition. Background (Specific): China faces this asymmetry with the rise of U.S. legal, economic, and technological pressures, particularly during escalating trade conflicts. Knowledge Gap: While many studies address industrial policy or competition law separately, limited scholarship integrates how China’s legal framework functions simultaneously as market regulation and geopolitical strategy. Aim: This study examines China’s technological self-reliance strategy by evaluating the role of the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) alongside major industrial policies in countering Western corporate hegemony. Results: Findings demonstrate that China employs AML with dual functionality—disciplining domestic giants such as Alibaba while fortifying national sovereignty against foreign corporate influence—and aligns this with three major initiatives: Made in China 2025, Dual Circulation Strategy, and China Standards 2035 to strengthen manufacturing capability, market independence, and global standard-setting authority. Novelty: Unlike traditional market-driven antitrust systems, China adopts state-oriented “antitrust mercantilism,” integrating competition law with industrial modernization and geopolitical objectives. Implications: The study indicates a shift in global competition norms, where national legal instruments increasingly function not only to balance market fairness but also to challenge structural dominance and redistribute global technological power. Highlights: China integrates antitrust law with industrial policy to strengthen technological independence. The strategy responds directly to Western corporate and geopolitical dominance in global technology. Policies such as MIC 2025, DCS, and China Standards 2035 reinforce sovereignty and global competitiveness. Keywords: Technological Self-Reliance, Anti-Monopoly Law, Industrial Policy, Western Dominance, China Strategy
Co-Authors Jonathan, Edward Lie, Gunardi Rasji, Rasji