Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE DETERMINATION OF THE SUSPECT BY THE KPK AFTER IT WAS DECLARED LEGITIMATE IN A PRE-TRIAL DECISION IN INDONESIA Roland Sahat Uli Banjarnahor; Ismaidar
International Conference on Health Science, Green Economics, Educational Review and Technology Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): 7th IHERT (2024): IHERT (2024) FIRST ISSUE: International Conference on Health
Publisher : Universitas Efarina

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ihert.v6i1.378

Abstract

Pretrial is something institution For test validity a case process criminal before case the reached the stage inspection principal case in court , related with determination of suspect status follow criminal often there are pros and cons from various party , determination of suspect status is authority from investigator , as has been outlined in the Criminal Procedure Code. Move on from determination of suspect status by regulated investigators through the Criminal Procedure Code, then task The determination of suspect status is also up to the investigator Commission Eradication Corruption (KPK) which is firm has arranged in Corruption Eradication Commission Law , throughout No arranged in the Corruption Eradication Committee Law and Law Eradication Act Criminal Corruption , then return to existing rules​ in the Criminal Procedure Code. Article 1 point 14 of the Criminal Procedure Code formulates that “ Suspect is someone who because his actions or the situation , based on proof At first , it's appropriate allegedly as perpetrator follow criminal ." While in Law Eradication Act Criminal Corruption and the Corruption Eradication Committee Law are not There is none article that explains about determination suspect . Furthermore when speak about How the authority of the Corruption Eradication Committee in matter determine suspect status follow criminal corruption so matter This No regardless from Pretrial as one of the possible efforts​ taken For straighten up law and protect rights suspect in level investigation and prosecution .
LEGAL STUDY OF ABUSE OF OFFICE LEADING TO CRIMINAL ACT OF CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA Roland Sahat Uli Banjarnahor; Ismaidar; T. Riza Zarzani
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): September
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59733/jishup.v2i3.100

Abstract

One of the things that hinders the country's economic growth is corruption. Any illegal activity directed at the country's economy or finances needs to be stopped and handled fairly. Abuse of authority, trust, or public or state office for personal gain is the reason that causes corruption. Corruption is classified as an extraordinary crime in order to hinder prosecution because it is difficult to prove the reason for the crime during the trial. those involved in corruption, and those who comply with it. The discussion in this studyHow is the Legal Study of Abuse of Office So That Corruption Occurs? And How is the Regulation of Abuse of Office in Corruption?, then the research method used is the normative legal research method, and the discussion of this study is, as regulated in Law Number 31 of 1999 and Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, a legal study of the regulation of abuse of office so that corruption occurs is caused by abuse of authority in office.