Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Health Security Protection For Indonesian Migrant Workers: A Ministerial Regulation Perspective Puspitasari, Eva
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 8 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Migrant workers are an asset for the country because they make many good contributions to the country. Just like other citizens, migrant workers have the right to access social security, especially health, in their country of placement. However, in reality access to health insurance in the host country is still limited due to the absence of technical regulations that specifically regulate this situation. Apart from that, the current policies are not yet able to protect migrant workers due to the lack of clarity regarding technical protection, which affects migrant workers' compliance in paying mandatory health insurance contributions. Therefore, this research will discuss in more detail the provision of social health security for migrant workers. The formulation of the problem studied in this research is what is the ideal health insurance protection policy for Indonesian Migrant Workers abroad? And how to strengthen the commitment to protect the health insurance of Indonesian Migrant Workers abroad in their country of placement? The research method used in this research is a normative legal method with statutory, case and conceptual approaches. This research finds that current policies do not provide good access for migrant workers, so policy reformulation is needed, one of which is a direct payment method from the government to the placement country. The strategy to strengthen commitment that can be carried out to provide good access to migrant workers is to make improvements in the legal system which includes substance, law enforcement and legal culture.

BRIGHTSIDAR: INOVASI MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN IPA TERINTEGRASI KONSEP SISTEM PEREDARAN DARAH DAN RANGKAIAN LISTRIK TIGA DIMENSI Diana Hapsari; Faradisya Ekapti, Rahmi; Dewi Khasanah, Alfiana; Puspitasari, Eva
Ibriez : Jurnal Kependidikan Dasar Islam Berbasis Sains Vol 9 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/ibriez.v9i2.606

Siswa sekolah dasar sering mengalami kesulitan dalam memahami konsep sistem peredaran darah serta organ yang ada dan fungsi dari organ. Rangkaian listrik merupakan salah satu konsep yang diajarkan dalam pembelajaran sekolah dasar. Media pembelajaran 3 dimensi sangat membantu dalam memahami dan menarik minat siswa terhadap konsep sistem peredaran darah sekaligus mengintegrasikan materi rangkaian listrik. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk memudahkan siswa sekolah dasar mempelajari konsep peredaran darah yang diintegrasikan dengan konsep rangkaian listrik dengan media pembelajaran 3 dimensi yang dinamakan “BrightSiDar”. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode Research and Development ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implementation, and Evaluation). Hasil validasi ahli merupakan pendukung dalam kelayakan pengembangan media pembelajaran terintegrasi 3 dimensi BrightSiDar. Hasil rata-rata validasi 3 ahli mengenai ketepatan konsep 93.33% kategori sangat valid, ketahanan alat 91,06% kategori sangat valid, estetika 80% kategori sangat baik, efisiensi alat sebesar 91,06% kategori sangat valid, dan keamanan alat sebesar 88.88% kategori sangat baik. Hasil pemahaman dengan media 77% konsep sistem peredaran darah dan 88% konsep rangkaian listrik. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini bahwa media BrigtSidar dapat digunakan sebagai media pembelajaran yang dapat mempermudah guru dalam menjelaskan konsep sistem peredaran darah dan rangkaian Listrik.

Health Security Protection For Indonesian Migrant Workers: A Ministerial Regulation Perspective Puspitasari, Eva
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 8 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Migrant workers are an asset for the country because they make many good contributions to the country. Just like other citizens, migrant workers have the right to access social security, especially health, in their country of placement. However, in reality access to health insurance in the host country is still limited due to the absence of technical regulations that specifically regulate this situation. Apart from that, the current policies are not yet able to protect migrant workers due to the lack of clarity regarding technical protection, which affects migrant workers' compliance in paying mandatory health insurance contributions. Therefore, this research will discuss in more detail the provision of social health security for migrant workers. The formulation of the problem studied in this research is what is the ideal health insurance protection policy for Indonesian Migrant Workers abroad? And how to strengthen the commitment to protect the health insurance of Indonesian Migrant Workers abroad in their country of placement? The research method used in this research is a normative legal method with statutory, case and conceptual approaches. This research finds that current policies do not provide good access for migrant workers, so policy reformulation is needed, one of which is a direct payment method from the government to the placement country. The strategy to strengthen commitment that can be carried out to provide good access to migrant workers is to make improvements in the legal system which includes substance, law enforcement and legal culture.

Effective Drill-Based Arithmetic Training for Improving Numeracy Literacy: A Quasi-Experimental Study With High N-Gain among Elementary Students Hunas, Safiru; Puspitasari, Eva; Rozak, Rama Wijaya Abdul; Rusmana, Nandang
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE) Vol 7 No 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jee.v7i2.2810

Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of a drill-based arithmetic training program in improving elementary students' numeracy literacy. Methodology: This quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest study involved 32 fourth-grade students selected through a total sampling approach. A 20-item arithmetic essay test was used as the instrument (CVR = 0.89; Cronbach's Alpha = 0.856). The intervention comprised 8 sessions (90 minutes each) integrating drill and practice, concrete manipulative media, scaffolding, peer tutoring, and corrective feedback. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test (α = 0.05) and Hake's N-Gain. Main Findings: Pretest scores were extremely low (M = 15.31), with 0% achieving KKM (Minimum Completion Criteria). Post-intervention scores rose to M = 82.03, a gain of 66.72 points (435.71%), with 84.4% of students achieving KKM. The Wilcoxon test confirmed a highly significant improvement (p = 0.000001), and N-Gain yielded a mean of 0.7964 (high category). Effectiveness is attributed to the integration of drill-and-practice (behavioristic theory), concrete manipulatives (Piaget), peer tutoring within the Zone of Proximal Development (Vygotsky), and gradual scaffolding. The N-Gain exceeded prior studies. Limitations include the absence of a control group and a small sample size, restricting generalizability. Novelty/Originality of this study: This is the first study to examine an integrated, multi-component program that addresses all four arithmetic operations simultaneously in Eastern Indonesia (Buton Regency), demonstrating that multi-component designs yield superior N-Gain outcomes and offering a replicable framework for teachers addressing low numeracy literacy.

Developing Holistic Gasing Evaluation Model to Balance Cognitive Efficiency and Affective Resilience Wijiningsih, Ninik; Puspitasari, Eva; Setiawan, Budi; Emilzoli, Mario
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE) Vol 7 No 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jee.v7i2.2825

Purpose of the study: The Gasing method (Gampang, Asyik, Menyenangkan) emphasizes ease and enjoyment, yet evaluations frequently neglect the core pillar of enjoyment. This research aims to construct and validate the Holistic Gasing Evaluation Model (HGEM) to balance cognitive speed with affective resilience, making instructional claims of joy empirically verifiable. Methodology: This study utilizes a Type 2 Design and Development Research approach. The procedure involves a systematic analysis of eighty-three empirical papers via Publish or Perish software. A conceptual design phase synthesizes identified theoretical references to establish thirty-six specific model sub-indicators. The final development phase employs the Aiken method with three doctoral experts to validate the model content and structural integrity. Main Findings: The Holistic Gasing Evaluation Model establishes five core dimensions supported by thirty-six psychometric sub-indicators, replacing anecdotal observations with validated instruments like the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Results show a mean Aiken’s V of 0.86. Discussion indicates that standardizing these metrics identifies instructional risks when rapid speed gains correlate with elevated anxiety, ensuring sustainable numerical performance. The primary limitation of this developmental phase is the focus on internal content validation without immediate large-scale longitudinal field data. Novelty/Originality of this study: This research introduces the first psychometrically validated Affective-Safety guardrail for Gasing evaluation, directly resolving the "Joy Paradox" where anecdotal claims of enjoyment lack empirical verification. By transitioning from qualitative narratives to rigorous standardized benchmarks, this study advances knowledge by ensuring that rapid computational gains do not compromise student affective well-being through replicable assessment protocols.

Integrating Systematic and Adaptive Curriculum Implementation: A Comparative Model for Inclusive 21st-Century Education Puspitasari, Eva; Wijiningsih, Ninik; Susilana, Rudi; Johan, Riche Cynthia
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE) Vol 7 No 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jee.v7i1.2254

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this research is to compare various approaches in curriculum implementation and provide recommendations for further development. Methodology: Using qualitative method with a descriptive approach of field research. The subjects were secondary school teachers, while the informants were school principals. Subjects and informants were selected using purposive sampling, based on relevance and direct involvement in curriculum implementation. The research instruments included interview guidelines and observation sheets. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and direct observations at the school. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key themes and patterns from the interviews and observations. Main Findings: The findings of this study imply that curriculum development in the context of 21st-century education should not rely solely on rigid standardization or full flexibility, but rather on a strategic integration of systematic and adaptive approaches. Practically, schools are encouraged to strengthen curriculum management through structured planning, supervision, and the utilization of digital management systems such as MIS and LMS, while simultaneously providing pedagogical flexibility through differentiated and contextual learning that responds to students’ diverse needs and learning styles. For policymakers and school leaders, these results highlight the importance of developing curriculum policies that support both institutional accountability and instructional adaptability, particularly in promoting inclusive education for students with special needs. Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this research lies in the comparison of two curriculum implementation approaches and the recommendation to integrate both to create a more effective, flexible, and contextual curriculum.

Effective Drill-Based Arithmetic Training for Improving Numeracy Literacy: A Quasi-Experimental Study With High N-Gain among Elementary Students Hunas, Safiru; Puspitasari, Eva; Rozak, Rama Wijaya Abdul; Rusmana, Nandang
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE) Vol 7 No 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jee.v7i2.2810

Purpose of the study: This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of a drill-based arithmetic training program in improving elementary students' numeracy literacy. Methodology: This quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest study involved 32 fourth-grade students selected through a total sampling approach. A 20-item arithmetic essay test was used as the instrument (CVR = 0.89; Cronbach's Alpha = 0.856). The intervention comprised 8 sessions (90 minutes each) integrating drill and practice, concrete manipulative media, scaffolding, peer tutoring, and corrective feedback. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test (α = 0.05) and Hake's N-Gain. Main Findings: Pretest scores were extremely low (M = 15.31), with 0% achieving KKM (Minimum Completion Criteria). Post-intervention scores rose to M = 82.03, a gain of 66.72 points (435.71%), with 84.4% of students achieving KKM. The Wilcoxon test confirmed a highly significant improvement (p = 0.000001), and N-Gain yielded a mean of 0.7964 (high category). Effectiveness is attributed to the integration of drill-and-practice (behavioristic theory), concrete manipulatives (Piaget), peer tutoring within the Zone of Proximal Development (Vygotsky), and gradual scaffolding. The N-Gain exceeded prior studies. Limitations include the absence of a control group and a small sample size, restricting generalizability. Novelty/Originality of this study: This is the first study to examine an integrated, multi-component program that addresses all four arithmetic operations simultaneously in Eastern Indonesia (Buton Regency), demonstrating that multi-component designs yield superior N-Gain outcomes and offering a replicable framework for teachers addressing low numeracy literacy.

Developing Holistic Gasing Evaluation Model to Balance Cognitive Efficiency and Affective Resilience Wijiningsih, Ninik; Puspitasari, Eva; Setiawan, Budi; Emilzoli, Mario
Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE) Vol 7 No 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/jee.v7i2.2825

Purpose of the study: The Gasing method (Gampang, Asyik, Menyenangkan) emphasizes ease and enjoyment, yet evaluations frequently neglect the core pillar of enjoyment. This research aims to construct and validate the Holistic Gasing Evaluation Model (HGEM) to balance cognitive speed with affective resilience, making instructional claims of joy empirically verifiable. Methodology: This study utilizes a Type 2 Design and Development Research approach. The procedure involves a systematic analysis of eighty-three empirical papers via Publish or Perish software. A conceptual design phase synthesizes identified theoretical references to establish thirty-six specific model sub-indicators. The final development phase employs the Aiken method with three doctoral experts to validate the model content and structural integrity. Main Findings: The Holistic Gasing Evaluation Model establishes five core dimensions supported by thirty-six psychometric sub-indicators, replacing anecdotal observations with validated instruments like the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Results show a mean Aiken’s V of 0.86. Discussion indicates that standardizing these metrics identifies instructional risks when rapid speed gains correlate with elevated anxiety, ensuring sustainable numerical performance. The primary limitation of this developmental phase is the focus on internal content validation without immediate large-scale longitudinal field data. Novelty/Originality of this study: This research introduces the first psychometrically validated Affective-Safety guardrail for Gasing evaluation, directly resolving the "Joy Paradox" where anecdotal claims of enjoyment lack empirical verification. By transitioning from qualitative narratives to rigorous standardized benchmarks, this study advances knowledge by ensuring that rapid computational gains do not compromise student affective well-being through replicable assessment protocols.

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 8 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search