Krustiyati, J. M. Atik
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

State Responsibility for Environmental Damage from Climate Change under the No-Harm Principle Dewanto, Wisnu Aryo; Krustiyati, J. M. Atik
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 8 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v8i1.200

Abstract

This research delves into the critical role of states in addressing environmental damage stemming from climate change, underpinned by the fundamental principle of “no harm”. Climate change represents a profound threat to both the global ecosystem and human welfare, necessitating concerted action from all nations. The no harm principle places an obligation on states to undertake effective measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, facilitate adaptation to climate change impacts, and mitigate adverse effects on vulnerable communities. This research uses normative legal research methods with a regulatory and contextual approach. By examining both theoretical frameworks and legal instruments, the study aims to elucidate the responsibilities of states and the mechanisms through which they can fulfill these obligations. A central focus of this research is the examination of how nations collaborate internationally to achieve climate change mitigation and adaptation goals through global agreements. These agreements serve as frameworks for collective action, guiding states in their efforts to combat climate change and minimize its harmful effects. By emphasizing the no harm principle, this study seeks to deepen our understanding of state responsibility for climate change and associated environmental damage. It underscores the imperative for robust collaborative endeavors aimed at safeguarding the global environment and ensuring a sustainable future for all. Through enhanced awareness and collective action, states can fulfill their duty to protect the planet and mitigate the adverse impacts of climate change on present and future generations.
Implementation The Precautionary Principle For Land Deed Officials In Making Deeds Of Granting Mortgage Rights Aziziyah, Alvina Nur; Krustiyati, J. M. Atik
MIMBAR YUSTITIA : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 8 No 2 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v8i2.8059

Abstract

PPAT in carrying out legal actions must always act carefully. PPAT before making a deed, must examine all relevant facts in its considerations based on applicable laws and regulations. This study aims to determine the application of the principle of caution of PPAT in making APHT and to determine the responsibility of PPAT in making APHT whose formal requirements are not met. This study is an empirical juridical legal study, namely legal research on the implementation of normative legal provisions in real behavior in legal events that occur. The results of the study explain that PPAT must apply the principle of caution and pay attention to the procedures in making APHT, as per Article 10 of the Mortgage Law. If PPAT is not careful in checking important facts, it means that PPAT violates the Principle of PPAT caution only explained in Article 22 of PP PPAT that the PPAT Deed must be read/explained to the parties in the presence of at least 2 (two) witnesses before being signed immediately by the parties, witnesses and PPAT. PPAT is personally responsible for the implementation of his duties and positions in every deed, including making APHT. Therefore, the role of PPAT in making APHT for creditors and debtors is to bridge the interests of debtors with the interests of creditors so that both parties get a sense of justice, benefit, and legal certainty in binding the Mortgage Right guarantee so that there are no legal defects.