Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Partisipasi Masyarakat dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Proses Legislasi di Indonesia: Tinjauan Analitis Terhadap Peran Rakyat dalam Pembentukan Kebijakan Publik Danar Aji Kirana; Muhammad Anas Ulil Abshor Munif; Mokhamad Fajar Zihady Faturrahman; Radithya Fathan Al Gibran
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Agustus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v2i3.1260

Abstract

As a state of law, legislation is fundamentally important for the way of life of a state. Legislation is made not only to regulate the powers that exist towards the ruler and the people, but also has important points in running the life of the state in accordance with what is to be realized in the constitution. Legislation basically has binding force on the entire public, so the public should be involved in the legislative process because this is also to encourage the quality of legal products that are in accordance with developments and public needs. Public participation is one of the important foundations in making legal products that favor and provide benefits to the community. Thus, this paper addresses how a legal product is made in accordance with public needs and how legislation should be implemented by the authorities. This study also discusses how to form recommendations regarding improving the quality of public participation in the legislative process.
Problematika Asas kebebasan Berkontrak dalam Perancangan Kontrak Jual Beli: Telaah terhadap Posisi Tawar Para Pihak Nita Ayuningsih; Mokhamad Fajar Zihady Faturrahman; Vania Aulia; Rayi Kharisma Rajib
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v2i4.2656

Abstract

The strong bargaining power imbalance in the formation of sales contracts, particularly in standard contracts unilaterally drafted by business actors, undermines the principle of freedom of contract, as it is not accompanied by the principle of balance that should ensure a proportional distribution of rights and obligations. This study aims to identify legal issues arising from such imbalances and examine how the principle of balance can be effectively implemented to achieve contractual justice. Using a normative juridical method and conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches, the research finds that exoneration clauses, unilateral clauses, and “take it or leave it” practices are the primary causes of the loss of substantive consensus in standard contracts. The findings indicate that existing legal protections are still insufficient to prevent the dominance of business actors an issue increasingly evident in the rapidly growing digital sector. The study highlights the need for stronger supervisory instruments, greater transparency in contract drafting, and the reformulation of standard clauses to better reflect proportionality. It also opens opportunities for further empirical research to assess the effectiveness of applying the principle of balance in everyday contractual practices.